2008
DOI: 10.1899/08-015.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Downstream effects of mountaintop coal mining: comparing biological conditions using family- and genus-level macroinvertebrate bioassessment tools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

39
508
4
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 380 publications
(563 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
39
508
4
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The Watershed Assessment Database (WABbase), which was obtained from the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection, is described by Cormier et al [1] and was used to derive the conductivity benchmark. Additional information sources were used, including (1) toxicity tests from peer-reviewed literature [7]; (2) information on the effects of ionic mixtures on freshwater invertebrates from standard texts and physiological reviews [8][9][10][11][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]; (3) a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) Region 3 data set from Gregory J. Pond, which includes the original data found in Pond et al [6] and data collected for a Programmatic Environmental Impact Assessment [24]; (4) data on the composition of Marcellus shale brine from Amy Bergdale, U.S. EPA Region 3, based on analyses by drilling operators; (5) data from the Kentucky Division of Water database [2]; and (6) geographic and related information from the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection and public sources [1,2].…”
Section: Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The Watershed Assessment Database (WABbase), which was obtained from the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection, is described by Cormier et al [1] and was used to derive the conductivity benchmark. Additional information sources were used, including (1) toxicity tests from peer-reviewed literature [7]; (2) information on the effects of ionic mixtures on freshwater invertebrates from standard texts and physiological reviews [8][9][10][11][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]; (3) a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) Region 3 data set from Gregory J. Pond, which includes the original data found in Pond et al [6] and data collected for a Programmatic Environmental Impact Assessment [24]; (4) data on the composition of Marcellus shale brine from Amy Bergdale, U.S. EPA Region 3, based on analyses by drilling operators; (5) data from the Kentucky Division of Water database [2]; and (6) geographic and related information from the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection and public sources [1,2].…”
Section: Data Setsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of matched mined and unmined streams provide another way to examine co-occurrence. Pond et al [6] compared sites in three unmined watersheds with three nearby reclaimed mined watersheds below valleys filled with mountaintop mining overburden (MTM-Valley Fill; Table 3). The conductivity is lower in the unmined sites compared to the reclaimed mined sites, and all of the biological metrics are greater in the unmined sites, even though habitat scores are similar.…”
Section: Co-occurrencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations