2019
DOI: 10.1101/721159
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Downscaling livestock census data using multivariate predictive models: sensitivity to modifiable areal unit problem

Abstract: The analysis of census data aggregated by administrative units introduces a statistical bias known as the modifiable areal unit problem (MAUP). Previous researches have mostly assessed the effect of MAUP on upscaling models. The present study contributes to clarify the effects of MAUP on the downscaling methodologies, highlighting how a priori scales and shapes choices could influence the results. We aggregated chicken and duck fine-resolution census in Thailand, using three administrative census levels in reg… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our modelling approach focused on the "species fundamental thermal niche" concept (sensu Hutchinson [118]) by considering temperature as the main driver of population dynamics. In light of this, the choice of temperature datasets is crucial [119]; for example, pixel size may influence model outcome because of the aggregating effect of the Modifiable Unit Areal Problem [120][121][122]. Climatic reanalysis and global/regional circulation models are reliable data sources with high temporal resolution for present climatic conditions and robust future projections, but they have coarse spatial resolution that may underestimate the microclimate and its effects on species biology [15,123].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our modelling approach focused on the "species fundamental thermal niche" concept (sensu Hutchinson [118]) by considering temperature as the main driver of population dynamics. In light of this, the choice of temperature datasets is crucial [119]; for example, pixel size may influence model outcome because of the aggregating effect of the Modifiable Unit Areal Problem [120][121][122]. Climatic reanalysis and global/regional circulation models are reliable data sources with high temporal resolution for present climatic conditions and robust future projections, but they have coarse spatial resolution that may underestimate the microclimate and its effects on species biology [15,123].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Returning to the MAUP and the issue of ecological fallacy, users should carefully consider how the level of geographic analysis will impact interpretation of results when using disadvantage indices. Resolving biases that result from the aggregation of spatial data requires critically appraising geographic scope and using the smallest groupings, where possible, to examine variables for mapping 71 . Before making allocation decisions or implementing interventions, policymakers should analyze local clustering and context to ensure appropriate interpretation of neighborhood‐level disadvantage.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resolving biases that result from the aggregation of spatial data requires critically appraising geographic scope and using the smallest groupings, where possible, to examine variables for mapping. 71 Users should also consider that geographic boundary definitions might not be sensitive to demographic changes due to displacement or sociopolitical processes like gentrification or gerrymandering. Further, as noted in other research, many patterns of social risk overlap with historic redlining practices and racial housing segregation.…”
Section: Approaches For Improving Use Of Disadvantage Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, we recognise that pixel size may influence model outcome because of the aggregating effect of the Modifiable Unit Areal Problem (Jelinski and Wu, 1996; Da Re et al, 2020). While the consequences of this artifact are well known in SDMs applications, they are rarely mentioned or addressed (but see Peterson, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%