2017
DOI: 10.12957/matraga.2017.28781
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Down two steps: Are bilinguals delayed in the acquisition of recursively embedded PPs?

Abstract: The present study examines whether bilingual children are delayed in the ability to produce complex DPs. We elicited production of DPs containing two PP modifiers, in two conditions designed to tease apart the acquisition of an embedding rule from the acquisition of the recursivity of an embedding rule. In the recursive condition, one modifier PP was itself modified by an additional PP. In the non-recursive condition, both PPs sequentially modified the main noun. Participants were 71 English monolingual childr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In child English, recursive possessive and Prepositional Phrase (PP) structures are rare in production, and difficult to understand (Limbach and Adone 2010;Roeper 2011;Pérez-Leroux et al 2012). Despite these challenges, the acquisition of recursive modification (RM) proves to be resilient, and acquirable even under severely degraded input conditions, such as in deaf home signers (Goldin-Meadow 1982) and bilinguals (Pérez-Leroux et al 2017). The structures that can function recursively vary across different languages, fueling the controversy regarding the universality of recursion (Evans and Levinson 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In child English, recursive possessive and Prepositional Phrase (PP) structures are rare in production, and difficult to understand (Limbach and Adone 2010;Roeper 2011;Pérez-Leroux et al 2012). Despite these challenges, the acquisition of recursive modification (RM) proves to be resilient, and acquirable even under severely degraded input conditions, such as in deaf home signers (Goldin-Meadow 1982) and bilinguals (Pérez-Leroux et al 2017). The structures that can function recursively vary across different languages, fueling the controversy regarding the universality of recursion (Evans and Levinson 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%