Doubly Marginalized: Addressing the Minority Stressors Experienced by LGBTQ+ Researchers Who Do LGBTQ+ Research

Abstract

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and nonbinary, and queer people (LGBTQ+) experience significantly higher levels of stressors due to discrimination, stigma, and marginalization than do cisgender heterosexual people. These high levels of stressors have impacts on health and well-being as well as career impacts. Limited research suggests that within higher education LGBTQ+ faculty experience bullying, discrimination, and harassment within the workplace. There is also data to suggest that research on marginalized populations is perceived to be less objective and valuable than research on majority populations. Research on the challenges of being a member of a marginalized population who conducts research on the same population suggests potentially negative career and personal impacts. To my knowledge, there has been little to no research on the double marginalization related to being an LGBTQ+ researcher doing research within the LGBTQ+ community. To describe the potential impacts of being an LGBTQ+ researcher who does LGBTQ+ research, I apply the extant literature on marginalized researchers who do research among marginalized populations to LGBTQ+ researchers. I also describe the potential minority stressors that LGBTQ+ researchers may face and how that may impact careers. Finally, I offer multiple recommendations for improvements for our research community and argue that senior faculty, leadership, and mentors can take specific actions to lessen stressors for LGBTQ+ researchers studying LGBTQ-related topics.

Dealing With Diversity in Psychology: Science and Ideology

“…This is why diversity is necessary. Without it, the epistemologies of the marginalized will remain filtered through systems of epistemic violence, aggression, and silencing (Dotson, 2011; Johnson et al, 2021; Ohito, 2020; Settles et al, 2021; Veldhuis, 2022). It is time for psychological science to acknowledge that editors, as well as reviewers and authors, are in an epistemological gatekeeping position from which to govern what is (and what is not) worthy of publication (see Roberts et al, 2020).…”

Sexual orientation and gender diversity research manuscript writing guide.

“…Journal editors and reviewers often also request that citations be to the recent literature, which can exclude some of the formative research and theorizing in the field. Within the context of academia, the number of times papers are cited has implications for tenure and promotion, which has downstream effects on representation of 2SLGBTQIA+ people in academia, particularly among tenured faculty (Veldhuis, 2022). Ethical citation practices likewise help ensure credit for our ideas and work.…”

An intersectional approach to understanding minority stressors and relationship satisfaction in sexual and gender minority women’s same-gender interracial/interethnic intimate relationships.

“…We began recruiting broadly on social media using paid ads as we wanted to reach participants who were more diverse and who were not well-connected to LGBTQ+ communities. However, we shifted to recruitment just through LGBTQ sources to minimize stress on the team (Veldhuis, 2022). This likely means that our sample is more apt to be connected to LGBTQ+ communities, more likely to be "out," and possibly may experience lower levels of stressors.…”