2019
DOI: 10.1039/c8cp07880g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Double-well potential energy surface in the interaction between h-BN and Ni(111)

Abstract: Density functional theory calculations with non-local correlation functionals, properly accounting for dispersion forces, predict the presence of two minima in the interaction energy between h-BN and Ni(111).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(54 reference statements)
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The electron affinity (EA) is found to be 1.64 eV. The GGA value of the p-SBH of ∼2.3 eV is consistent with ref ; the p-SBH found by GGA + U and HSE is now 4 eV. Figure shows the band diagram of both chemisorption and physisorption interfaces of h-BN.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The electron affinity (EA) is found to be 1.64 eV. The GGA value of the p-SBH of ∼2.3 eV is consistent with ref ; the p-SBH found by GGA + U and HSE is now 4 eV. Figure shows the band diagram of both chemisorption and physisorption interfaces of h-BN.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…For this, we create a √7 × √7 structure with a layer separation of 3.45 Å, as shown in Figure 3c. At the physisorption distance (the blue region shown in Figure 3d,e), the energy dependence of the contact configuration is less evident than that at the chemisorptive distance, which is also verified in ref 48. Both the B on-top and the pseudo incommensurate √7 configurations are metastable states.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…Note the Moire models in (c,d) have a large interlayer distance (labelled as d ) and thus weaker interlayer interaction. (e) Calculated interface binding energy for chemisorptive and physisorptive sites of Ni on h-BN with optB88-vdw and optB86b-vdw functionals 32 for reference, showing a similar trend to ref ( 21 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…This is readily seen for the second-row compound h-BN with lattice-matched metals such as Fe, Co, and Ni. Here, the chemisorptive site is the N on top of the metal site, whereas rotating the h-BN lattice to form the (√3×√3) orientation provides a physisorptive site with both B and N lying off-center and with a much larger interlayer spacing, 21 24 as schematically shown in Figure 1 e. The slope factor of h-BN contacts was found to be dramatically different for each site, S ∼ 0.26 for the chemisorptive site, while S ∼ 1 for the physisorptive site. 22 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…h-BN has a good lattice-match to the (111) surfaces of the three magnetic metals Fe, Ni and Co, taken in the fcc structures. [62][63][64] can adopt three different bonding sites on (111) Ni surfaces in density functional (DFT) calculations: the metal on N-top, B-top, and in the incommensurate ͱ7 Â ͱ7 structure, [62][63][64][65] as seen in Fig. 10(a)-10(c).…”
Section: Bonding Sites Of H-bn On Ni Co Fe Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%