2000
DOI: 10.1097/00008526-200012030-00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Double-Wall, Transtibial Prosthetic Socket Fabricated Using Selective Laser Sintering: A Case Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CAD data can then be sent to a rapid prototyping machine for fabrication. The use of rapid prototyping machine to fabricate prosthetic socket has been reported in the literature [31][32]. With CAD/ CAM techniques, monolimbs can be tailored to vary wall thickness and geometry of the shank.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CAD data can then be sent to a rapid prototyping machine for fabrication. The use of rapid prototyping machine to fabricate prosthetic socket has been reported in the literature [31][32]. With CAD/ CAM techniques, monolimbs can be tailored to vary wall thickness and geometry of the shank.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers however, have proposed compliant socket designs to offer relief in vulnerable regions, such as near bony protrusions. For instance by varying the socket wall thickness and by introducing deformable structures [19], by introducing a variable spacing between a flexible inner and rigid outer socket [20], and finally by spatially varying the elastic material properties of the socket [21]. The preliminary findings of the latter study were reduced contact pressures for a compliant socket compared to a conventional socket.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In prosthetics, some patients might require a special, more accurate socket shape while other patients might do fine with the normal quality shape. Presumably, the cost of fabricating a very accurately shaped socket is higher, particularly if the latest technology is used, i.e., additive fabrication techniques [12][13][14][15][16]. One possible means for managing these differences in patient adaptability is to distinguish the minimally adaptable patient by a special rating, for example a rating termed "P-1."…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct socket fabrication approaches have been pursued in research investigations and potentially have less error than current CAM techniques [12][13][14][15][16]18]. While moving to one of these technologies can potentially overcome shape fabrication error, these technologies are not yet commercially available for prosthetics.…”
Section: Overcoming Errormentioning
confidence: 99%