1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf00035715
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Double virtual crack extension method for crack growth stability assessment

Abstract: The second variation of energy corresponding to crack length is required in the stability analysis of crack growth. For determining such an energy gradient, an efficient finite element method extending the classical virtual crack extension concept is described in this paper. In elasticity, the method can be used for the prediction of the growth pattern of one single "crack, and especially a system of interacting cracks as well from the results of a single strain-stress analysis. Example computations are perfor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(16 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A stability analysis based on a second variation of the Lagrangian form (4) determines the most stable crack configuration evolution corresponding to that with the minimum energy dissipation [21,22]. The derivatives of the energy release rate with respect to the crack length [50,51], are computed by a generalized X-FEM formulation [21] of the FEM formulation developed by several authors [52][53][54]. All subdeterminants of this matrix [∂G i /∂ j ] are computed at time t n−1 and the maximum subdeterminant gives the set of tips N act that will grow at time step t n determined by:…”
Section: Description Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A stability analysis based on a second variation of the Lagrangian form (4) determines the most stable crack configuration evolution corresponding to that with the minimum energy dissipation [21,22]. The derivatives of the energy release rate with respect to the crack length [50,51], are computed by a generalized X-FEM formulation [21] of the FEM formulation developed by several authors [52][53][54]. All subdeterminants of this matrix [∂G i /∂ j ] are computed at time t n−1 and the maximum subdeterminant gives the set of tips N act that will grow at time step t n determined by:…”
Section: Description Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem of a finite plate with a center crack was studied [10]. The geometry of the plate is described in Fig.…”
Section: Center Crack In a Finite Platementioning
confidence: 99%
“…21. The analytical solution to this problem is given in Suo and Combescure [10]. The stress intensity factor is given by:…”
Section: Center Crack In a Finite Platementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the first approach, Lin and Abel (1988) introduced a variational formulation in conjunction with a virtual crack extension technique (delorenzi, 1982, 1985Haber and Koh, 1985;Barbero and Reddy, 1990) (primarily used for calculating SIFs indirectly) to calculate the firstorder derivative of SIF for a single crack. Later, Suo and Combescure (1992) developed a double virtual crack extension method to calculate the first-order sensitivity of the energy release rate (ERR) with respect to the crack size. This method cleverly avoids calculation of the second-order derivative of the stiffness matrix and is applicable under combined loading conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No mesh perturbation is necessary in the latter approach involving continuum shape sensitivity analysis. However, shape sensitivity methods available today (e.g., de Lorenzi, 1982de Lorenzi, , 1985Haber and Koh, 1985;Barbero and Reddy, 1990;Keum and Kwak, 1992;Suo and Combescure, 1992;Hwang et al, 1998;Feijóo et al, 2000;Taroco, 2000;Chen et al, 2001a, b;2002) are valid only for linear-elastic cracked structures. Since for some materials the nonlinear fracture-mechanics theory predicts more realistic fracture behavior than the linearelastic theory, there is a dire need to develop sensitivity equations for nonlinear-elastic cracked structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%