Double-Versus Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructive Surgery: A Prospective Study With >1 Year Follow-Up

Abstract

BackgroundThe increased prevalence of knee trauma predominantly adds to the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear frequencies that require single-or double-bundle reconstructive surgeries. Few studies have demonstrated the superior results of double-bundle reconstruction compared to single-bundle approaches. This study investigated the knee function improvement capacity of both reconstruction techniques in patients with ACL tears. MethodsThirty cases with ACL tears have been enrolled and segregated equally in distinct (single-bundle versus double-bundle) batches. The diagnostic assessments were undertaken through comprehensive clinical history, knee radiographs, Lysholm scoring, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scale, the Lachman analysis, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scale, and the pivot shift method. ResultsAfter one year, there was a significant enhancement in the postoperative versus preoperative Lysholm scores in the single-bundle (58.5 ± 21.2 vs. 82.4 ± 26.2, p<0.001) and double-bundle (86.4 ± 22.8 vs 60.3 ± 19.2, p<0.001) groups. There was a significant improvement in the IKDC scores after a follow-up period of one year (p-value: 0.012 and p-value: 0.002, respectively) in both of the study batches. After a year of follow-up, Lysholm scores (p=0.352) and IKDC scores (p=0.574) between the study groups (82.4 ± 26.2 vs. 86.4 ± 22.8) were comparable. ConclusionThe clinical outcomes remained comparable between subjects with single-bundle reconstruction versus double-bundle reconstruction subjects with ACL injuries. Findings were similar between the groups after one year and two years of surgical interventions.