2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.12.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Double twinning in Ni–Mn–Ga–Co

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(26 reference statements)
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This indicates that the high mobility of the interfaces may not be directly related to the modulations or to the crystal structure. This is also in agreement with the fact that while a Ni-Mn-Ga-Co alloy (4.9 at.% of Co) with very similar structure and lattice parameters as 14 M Ni-Mn-Ga exhibits a conventionally high twinning stress [18] (reorientation under 25 MPa), the 14 M martensite of Ni-Fe-Ga-Co alloy has a low twinning stress of approximately 1 MPa [19].…”
Section: Comparison With Other Smassupporting
confidence: 70%
“…This indicates that the high mobility of the interfaces may not be directly related to the modulations or to the crystal structure. This is also in agreement with the fact that while a Ni-Mn-Ga-Co alloy (4.9 at.% of Co) with very similar structure and lattice parameters as 14 M Ni-Mn-Ga exhibits a conventionally high twinning stress [18] (reorientation under 25 MPa), the 14 M martensite of Ni-Fe-Ga-Co alloy has a low twinning stress of approximately 1 MPa [19].…”
Section: Comparison With Other Smassupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Considerable strain deformation and large recovery ratio have been observed in polycrystalline Ni 53.5 Mn 26.0 Ga 20.5 alloy that crystallizes in 7 M monoclinic structure with magneto-structural transformation, owing to low residual stresses and multimode twinning [22]. Recent Electron Backscatter Diffraction (EBSD) studies report further insight into the orientation relations between twin variants in Ni 50 Mn 28 Many recent studies on quasi-ternary Ni-Mn-Ga-X alloys have been directed at the selective partial substitution of 3d elements, Co and Fe [6,[24][25][26][27][28]. Substitution of Co for Ni causes an increase Table 1 Chemical composition from EDAX, electron per atom ratio, martensitic start (Ms), martensitic finish (M f ), austenite start (As) and austenite finish (A f ), martensitic transformation temperature (TM = (Ms + M f + As + A f )/4) and Curie temperature (TC) of Co-doped alloys currently studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later several distinct martensite structures were observed in NMGs: seven (14 M) modulated martensite [3,13], five (10 M) modulated martensite [14][15][16], nonmodulated martensite [17]. It was suggested that the shape memory effect is largely determined by the arrangement, type and movement of the twin boundaries (TBs) in NMG alloys [18][19][20][21][22]. The minimal stress needed to move a TB determines the critical twinning stress.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%