2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.mechatronics.2018.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Double stage FPCB scanning micromirror for laser line generator

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We can observe that the sensor output signal is nearly in phase with the driving signal. The small phase difference of 5.1° is caused by the superposed coupling signal in the sensing coil, and it is close to the theoretical value of 4.4° calculated by Equation (14). Meanwhile, the coupling signal in the sensing coil has a phase difference of 89.6° with the driving signal, which is also very close to the theoretical value of 90° calculated from Equation (11).…”
Section: Principle and Modelingsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We can observe that the sensor output signal is nearly in phase with the driving signal. The small phase difference of 5.1° is caused by the superposed coupling signal in the sensing coil, and it is close to the theoretical value of 4.4° calculated by Equation (14). Meanwhile, the coupling signal in the sensing coil has a phase difference of 89.6° with the driving signal, which is also very close to the theoretical value of 90° calculated from Equation (11).…”
Section: Principle and Modelingsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…where ϕ is the phase difference between the output voltage U s and the moving-induced electromotive force ε s . Equations (13) and (14) give the relationship of the output voltage of the sensor and the deflection angle of the micromirror considering the coupling effect in theory. Figure 3a shows the schematic drawing of the measurement setup of the angle sensor.…”
Section: Principle and Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the second type needs to bond the mirror plate onto a released and fragile micro actuator, which is very difficult and then leads to a low bonding yield due to the low strain limit of the silicon flexible structure. In order to overcome this problem, flexible printed circuit board (FPCB) micromirrors were proposed and developed in [23,24,25,26] by the authors of the present paper, which have the mirror plate bonded to the FPCB structure. The flexible parts of FPCB structure are the polyimide layer or polyimide plus copper film laminate layer, which has a higher strain limit than silicon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those FPCB micromirrors share the same advantages as the second type of MEMS micromirrors, i.e., a large aperture and high flatness. Two driving methods are used for those FPCB micromirrors, i.e., electrostatic [23,24,25] and magnetic with the configuration of “moving coil plus external permanent magnet (PM)” [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%