2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-7152(99)00206-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Double-ranked set sampling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
64
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
64
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For this purpose, we define the following Relative Precisions (RP). (1) μ is a an unbiased estimator (1) μ is a biased estimator (2) μ is an unbiased estimator (2) μ is a biased estimator…”
Section: Comparision Of Estimatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For this purpose, we define the following Relative Precisions (RP). (1) μ is a an unbiased estimator (1) μ is a biased estimator (2) μ is an unbiased estimator (2) μ is a biased estimator…”
Section: Comparision Of Estimatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A sample of size m was selected and ranked. Let X (1) s,m be the s th smallest rank of the sample, where s=1,2,...,m.…”
Section: A Corollary-1mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Samawi and Muttlak [6] suggested RSS method for estimating the population ratio. Al-Saleh and Al-Kadiri [1] suggested double ranked set sampling method (DRSS) for estimating the population mean and they showed that the ranking at the second stage is easier than the ranking at the first stage. Muttlak [5] proposed percentile ranked set sampling (PRSS) for estimating the population mean.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We may repeat steps 1, 2 and 3 k-times to obtain DRSS sample of size n = rk. In DRSS, ranking in the second stage is easier than ranking in the first stage, (see Al-Saleh and Al-Kadiri, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%