Abstract:Let X be a nonsingular projective algebraic variety over C, and let M g,n,β (X) be the moduli space of stable maps f : (C, x 1 ,. .. , x n) → X from genus g, n-pointed curves C to X of degree β. Let S be a line bundle on X. Let A = (a 1 ,. .. , a n) be a vector of integers which satisfy n i=1 a i = β c 1 (S). Consider the following condition: the line bundle f * S has a meromorphic section with zeroes and poles exactly at the marked points x i with orders prescribed by the integers a i. In other words, we requ… Show more
“…In other words, the constant term of coincides with the pushforward of the corresponding relative Gromov–Witten cycle defined by Li [15, 16]. In terms of the localization computation, we only need the polynomiality in [14] and then take the ‐coefficient of the localization contribution. This localization computation is discussed in detail in Lemma 4.8.…”
Section: Relative Theory With Negative Contact Orders In All Generamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [14], we already know that is a polynomial in in Chow cohomology. When , this corollary is an improved bound of the lowest degree after capping with the virtual class.…”
Section: Hurwitz–hodge Classes and Dr‐cyclesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, double ramification cycles with target varieties have been studied in [14]. Given a line bundle over a smooth projective variety and a topological type , the double ramification cycle with the target variety is defined using the moduli space of relative stable maps to rubber targets over .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given a line bundle over a smooth projective variety and a topological type , the double ramification cycle with the target variety is defined using the moduli space of relative stable maps to rubber targets over . By [14], the double ramification cycle is equal to the constant term of the polynomial class , see Section 5 for the definition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formula for double ramification cycles in [13, 14] are obtained by relating it to certain Hurwitz–Hodge cycles which are also polynomials in and the constant terms coincide with the constant terms of . In Section 4, we generalize the identity between Hurwitz–Hodge cycles and double ramification cycles.…”
We extend the definition of relative Gromov–Witten invariants with negative contact orders to all genera. Then we show that relative Gromov–Witten theory forms a partial CohFT. Some cycle relations on the moduli space of stable maps are also proved.
“…In other words, the constant term of coincides with the pushforward of the corresponding relative Gromov–Witten cycle defined by Li [15, 16]. In terms of the localization computation, we only need the polynomiality in [14] and then take the ‐coefficient of the localization contribution. This localization computation is discussed in detail in Lemma 4.8.…”
Section: Relative Theory With Negative Contact Orders In All Generamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [14], we already know that is a polynomial in in Chow cohomology. When , this corollary is an improved bound of the lowest degree after capping with the virtual class.…”
Section: Hurwitz–hodge Classes and Dr‐cyclesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, double ramification cycles with target varieties have been studied in [14]. Given a line bundle over a smooth projective variety and a topological type , the double ramification cycle with the target variety is defined using the moduli space of relative stable maps to rubber targets over .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given a line bundle over a smooth projective variety and a topological type , the double ramification cycle with the target variety is defined using the moduli space of relative stable maps to rubber targets over . By [14], the double ramification cycle is equal to the constant term of the polynomial class , see Section 5 for the definition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formula for double ramification cycles in [13, 14] are obtained by relating it to certain Hurwitz–Hodge cycles which are also polynomials in and the constant terms coincide with the constant terms of . In Section 4, we generalize the identity between Hurwitz–Hodge cycles and double ramification cycles.…”
We extend the definition of relative Gromov–Witten invariants with negative contact orders to all genera. Then we show that relative Gromov–Witten theory forms a partial CohFT. Some cycle relations on the moduli space of stable maps are also proved.
In [TY18], higher genus Gromov-Witten invariants of the stack of r-th roots of a smooth projective variety X along a smooth divisor D are shown to be polynomials in r. In this paper we study the degrees and coefficients of these polynomials.
We define a new Gromov–Witten theory relative to simple normal crossing divisors as a limit of Gromov–Witten theory of multi-root stacks. Several structural properties are proved including relative quantum cohomology, Givental formalism, Virasoro constraints (genus zero) and a partial cohomological field theory. Furthermore, we use the degree zero part of the relative quantum cohomology to provide an alternative mirror construction of Gross and Siebert (Intrinsic mirror symmetry, arXiv:1909.07649) and to prove the Frobenius structure conjecture of Gross et al. (Publ Math Inst Hautes Études Sci 122:65–168, 2015) in our setting.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.