2016
DOI: 10.1097/ijg.0000000000000369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Double-Organ Bias in Published Randomized Controlled Trials of Glaucoma

Abstract: Double-organ bias was observed around 13.1% of the published RCTs, leading to inaccurate statistical testing.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
21
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, XFG had more cases treated with maximal medical therapy and a higher score of GSS 2, as expected. In order to select only one eye per subject and avoid the double-organ bias, 34 the present study had a small number of subjects with XFG, which could limit our results and conclusions about XFG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, XFG had more cases treated with maximal medical therapy and a higher score of GSS 2, as expected. In order to select only one eye per subject and avoid the double-organ bias, 34 the present study had a small number of subjects with XFG, which could limit our results and conclusions about XFG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eyes were included when baseline BCVA ranged from 24 to 78 ETDRS letters (L) (Snellen equivalent 20/320–20/32, LogMAR 1.22–0.14). When both eyes had DME, only one eye per patient was included [ 11 ]. The right eye was included in patients whose year of birth was an even number and the left eye was included when the year of birth was an odd number.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjects were excluded if they had regular astigmatism greater than 3.50 diopters (D) or any irregular astigmatism. To avoid the double-organ bias, one eye per individual was randomly included in the analysis using a table of random numbers for randomization [ 22 ]. In a fixed sequence, all of the subjects were examined with the three NCTs, the GAT and ultrasound pachymeter (850, Humphrey Instruments, Inc., San Leandro, CA, USA) to obtain IOP and central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements, respectively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%