Double-Negative T Cells Attenuate Cisplatin-Induced Acute Kidney Injury via Upregulating IL-10/AT2R Axis

Abstract

Objective. Our previous research showed that TCR+CD4-CD8-double-negative (DN) T cells protect renal epithelial cells from cisplatin-induced acute kidney injury (AKI). Therefore, this study is aimed at investigating the mechanism underlying the effect of DN T cells against Cis-induced AKI. Methods. HK-2 cells cultured alone or with DN T cells were treated with or without Cis. After treatment, the cell viability and death were analyzed by a CCK-8 kit and flow cytometric assay with Annexin V/PI staining, respectively. The expressions of inflammatory factors in HK-2 and DN T cells were analyzed using qPCR. The expression levels of nephrotoxicity-associated biomarkers (KIM, calbindin, and TIMP-1), Bcl-2, and angiotensin AT2 receptor (AT2R) were determined by Western blot and qPCR. Results. The administration of cisplatin significantly decreased the cell viability and AT2R expression, and increased cell death, inflammatory factors, and nephrotoxicity-associated biomarkers of HK-2 cells, while these effects were partly attenuated when cocultured with DN T cells. IL-10 expression was significantly increased in DN T cells after coculture, and cisplatin treatment aggravated this elevation. IL-10 supplementation exhibited a similar effect to coculture, whereas anti-IL-10 antibody reversed the effect of coculture on cisplatin-treated HK-2 cells. Finally, PD123319, an AT2R antagonist, also reversed the effect of IL-10 and coculture on the cell viability, death, and the expression of KIM, calbindin, TIMP-1, and Bcl-2 of cisplatin-treated HK-2 cells. Conclusions. DN T cells protected HK-2 cells from cisplatin-induced injury through IL-10/AT2R axis, which may act as a potential target for the treatment of cisplatin-induced AKI.

Retracted: Double‐Negative T Cells Attenuate Cisplatin‐Induced Acute Kidney Injury via Upregulating IL‐10/AT2R Axis

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [ 1 ]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process: Discrepancies in scope Discrepancies in the description of the research reported Discrepancies between the availability of data and the research described Inappropriate citations Incoherent, meaningless and/or irrelevant content included in the article Peer-review manipulation …”

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process: The presence of these indicators undermines our confidence in the integrity of the article's content and we cannot, therefore, vouch for its reliability.…”