2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00776-005-0921-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Double myxopapillary ependymoma of the cauda equina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We recently encountered a relatively rare case of bifocal MPE in a 25‐year‐old woman, and it is reported here. There are only four other cases of bifocal MPE of the filum terminale after an extensive review of the literature (for a table summarizing these cases, please go to: http://path.upmc.edu/divisions/neuropath/bpath/cases/case264.html.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We recently encountered a relatively rare case of bifocal MPE in a 25‐year‐old woman, and it is reported here. There are only four other cases of bifocal MPE of the filum terminale after an extensive review of the literature (for a table summarizing these cases, please go to: http://path.upmc.edu/divisions/neuropath/bpath/cases/case264.html.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And he confirmed the absence of tumor tissue strand in the terminal filum between both lesions. Nakama et al suspected it is possible that a double lesion is one aspect of the tumor progression. McLaughlin et al proposed patients with double MPE may potentially have an early genetic alteration in ependymal stem cells within filum terminale and the subsequent accumulation of different genetic alterations may explain the occurrence of two different lesions each harboring a different genetic signature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although they most frequently occur as solitary lesions, they may rarely present as two synchronous lesions located at both extremities of the filum terminale. [2][3][4] A review of the English literature identified only three other cases diagnosed specifically as double MPE of the filum terminale without any evidence of subarachnoid dissemination along the craniospinal axis (Table) [2][3][4] . As in the present case, lower back pain was present only a few months before diagnosis in all cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hallacq and colleagues, repeated pathology examination was performed and confirmed the absence of tumor tissue within the terminal filum between both lesions 2 . Given these imaging, macroscopic and microscopic findings, authors of previous cases of double MPE have concluded that these were independent lesions and not distant metastasis or dissemination along the neuraxis [2][3][4] .…”
Section: Figure 1: Pre-operative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Of the Lumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Нåäîñòàòíє зíàííя âзàємîâ³äíîñèí ïóхëèí ö³є¿ ëîêàë³зàö³¿ з мàã³ñòðàëüíèмè ñóäèíàмè СМ, яê³ чàñòî є мàã³ñòðàëüíèмè äëя зîí êðîâîîб³ãó åï³-êîíóñó, êîíóñó, ó äåяêèх ñèòóàö³ях зóмîâëює íàä-м³ðíèé ðàäèêàë³зм, â ³íшèх -îбмåaeóє îïåðàòèâíå âòðóчàííя ñóбòîòàëüíèм, à ³íîä³ чàñòêîâèм âèäà-ëåííям ïóхëèíè [9,11] х³äíå мàêñèмàëüíî ïîâíå âèäàëåííя ïóхëèíè, з чèм мè зíàчíîю м³ðîю ïîãîäaeóємîñü íà ï³äñòàâ³ àíàë³зó ðåзóëüòàò³â âëàñíèх ñïîñòåðåaeåíü. Пîâíå (òîòàëüíå) âèäàëåííя ïóхëèíè äîñяãíóòå ó 64,86% хâîðèх, â òîмó чèñë³ єäèíèм бëîêîм -ó 25,68%, шëяхîм êóñ-êóâàííя -ó 39,19%; ñóбòîòàëüíî ïóхëèíè âèäàëåíí³ ó 31,08%, чàñòêîâî -ó 2,7%.…”
Section: кëючîâ³ ñëîâà: термінальний відділ спинного мозку епендимомunclassified