2008
DOI: 10.1080/02796015.2008.12087865
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Double Jeopardy: Child and School Characteristics That Predict Aggressive-Disruptive Behavior in First Grade

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the quality of the classroom climate has been found to be related to disruptive behavior in the classroom. Variables indicative of a good classroom climate are effective classroom management practices, teacher involvement, teacher support, and student engagement (Thomas, Bierman, Thompson, & Powers, 2008). Thomas et al (2008) examined the impact of classroom climate on disruptive behavior in first grade.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, the quality of the classroom climate has been found to be related to disruptive behavior in the classroom. Variables indicative of a good classroom climate are effective classroom management practices, teacher involvement, teacher support, and student engagement (Thomas, Bierman, Thompson, & Powers, 2008). Thomas et al (2008) examined the impact of classroom climate on disruptive behavior in first grade.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variables indicative of a good classroom climate are effective classroom management practices, teacher involvement, teacher support, and student engagement (Thomas, Bierman, Thompson, & Powers, 2008). Thomas et al (2008) examined the impact of classroom climate on disruptive behavior in first grade. Their findings show that poor classroom quality increases the risk of aggressive-disruptive behavior at school when this behavior was exhibited at home prior to school entry.…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, during early childhood when children are more psychologically and physically dependent on parents, harsh and inconsistent parenting (Edens, Skopp, & Cahill, 2008; Gershoff, 2002; Odgers et al, 2008) as well as factors that compromise parenting (e.g., parental psychopathology, low satisfaction with social support; Shaw, Bell, & Gilliom, 2000; Zahn-Waxler, Iannotti, Cummings, & Denham, 1990) have been linked to children's emerging AB. As children move into the school-age period and adolescence, school quality (Thomas, Bierman, Thompson, Powers, & Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group, 2008), peer relationships (Trentacosta & Shaw, 2009), and neighborhood factors (Leventhal & Brooks-Gunn, 2000) play an increasingly critical role in the onset and maintenance of AB. Although the bulk of longitudinal research on AB has been concerned with school-age children, adolescents, and adults, studies demonstrating the greater malleability of child behavior and family relationships during early versus later childhood (Reid, Webster-Stratton, & Baydar, 2004) have motivated attempts to trace the environmental precursors of AB beginning in infancy and toddlerhood (Egeland, Kalkoske, Gottesman, & Erikson, 1990; Shaw, Hyde, & Brennan, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several contextual, interpersonal, and student-based factors associated with disruptive classroom behavior (Thomas, Bierman, Thompson, Powers, & The Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group, 2008). The contextual factors include class size, parent and community-based socioeconomic status, classroom seating arrangements and goal structures, school discipline policies, and teachers’ classroom management strategies (DiLalla & Mullineaux, 2008; Fleming et al, 2008; Guardino & Fullerton, 2010; Way, 2011).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some interpersonal sources of disruptive classroom behavior include the student-teacher relationship, teachers’ job satisfaction, peer relationships, and parental involvement (Gu, Lai, & Ye, 2011; Powers, Bierman, & The Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group, 2013). Student-based factors linked to disruptive classroom behavior include students’ emotional disturbance, diminished self-concept, and perceived academic competence (Bauermeister, Zimmerman, Barnett, & Caldwell, 2007; Bidell & Deacon, 2010; Thomas et al, 2008). Indeed, the literature is replete with examples of several contextual and person-centered factors that are associated with disruptive classroom behaviors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%