2018
DOI: 10.1109/trpms.2018.2870478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Double-Field Hadrontherapy Treatment Monitoring With the INSIDE In-Beam PET Scanner: Proof of Concept

Abstract: Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is a well established imaging technique for range monitoring in hadrontherapy. Multiple fields delivery is a standard protocol in treatments, but because of washout and residual activity background from previous irradiation plans, to this date a quantitative verification of the particle range for each beam field is still an open issue. In this paper, the proof of concept of a new method to evaluate with a PET detector the activity range of the second field of a treatment is d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MC simulation was developed in FLUKA, including all the characteristics and calibration of the INSIDE in-beam PET detector and all the features of the CNAO beam line and pencil beam scanning temporal structure [31,32]. The MC simulation was previously validated on phantoms with both monoenergetic beams [33] and treatment plans, for either protons [34,35] or carbon ions [36]. Furthermore, it was validated with the clinical measurement of the first patient ever monitored with the INSIDE in-beam PET scanner, where its agreement with the experimental measurements was found to have an uncertainty compatible with the agreement found when comparing two consecutive days measurements [37].…”
Section: Monte Carlo Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MC simulation was developed in FLUKA, including all the characteristics and calibration of the INSIDE in-beam PET detector and all the features of the CNAO beam line and pencil beam scanning temporal structure [31,32]. The MC simulation was previously validated on phantoms with both monoenergetic beams [33] and treatment plans, for either protons [34,35] or carbon ions [36]. Furthermore, it was validated with the clinical measurement of the first patient ever monitored with the INSIDE in-beam PET scanner, where its agreement with the experimental measurements was found to have an uncertainty compatible with the agreement found when comparing two consecutive days measurements [37].…”
Section: Monte Carlo Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, new cross section data for 10 C, 11 C, and O 15 , very useful for future benchmark studies, were published by different groups [133,136], where the work of Horst et al [136] concerns also data relative to C-C and C-O collisions. Since recently, the use of PET monitoring technique is under consideration also in the case of ion therapy [137]. The prediction capability for shortlived β + emitters remains subject to uncertainties.…”
Section: Measurements That Were Performed In the Context Of Range Monmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to the former method, this technique is more appropriate for complex treatment plans and can accommodate data obtained from various fields. For this article, the method proposed in [36] was slightly modified to account for truncation artifacts in z-direction. First, the image was filtered with a 3 × 3 × 3 mm 3 Gaussian filter.…”
Section: Range Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, the images were summed up in z-direction. Further filtering and contour extraction was performed as described in [36]. The contours from two images were then compared voxel-wise within the Bragg-peak region.…”
Section: Range Verificationmentioning
confidence: 99%