2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70617-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Double Dissociation between Meaningful and Meaningless Gesture Reproduction in Apraxia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
62
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
5
62
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This bidirectional influence between action observation and execution suggested to us to include both types of tasks in rehabilitation programs for LA (Smania et al, 2000;. As posited by influential cognitive neuropsychological models of apraxia (Rothi et al, 1991;Cubelli et al, 2000) and demonstrated by clinical studies (Goldenberg and Hagmann, 1997;Cubelli et al, 2000;Bartolo et al, 2001;Rumiati et al, 2001;Tessari et al, 2007), the range of possible dissociations between action execution and action understanding that can occur in apraxia is quite multifarious and cannot be explained by a mere action mirroring mechanism nor by a single lesion locus. Indeed, failures in imitating or in recognizing gestures may occur because of damage to a putative action semantics system or because of damage at any level in the process between perceiving (input lexicon) and performing (output lexicon) an action (Rothi et al, 1991;Cubelli et al, 2000).…”
Section: Seeing and Doing In Apraxiamentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This bidirectional influence between action observation and execution suggested to us to include both types of tasks in rehabilitation programs for LA (Smania et al, 2000;. As posited by influential cognitive neuropsychological models of apraxia (Rothi et al, 1991;Cubelli et al, 2000) and demonstrated by clinical studies (Goldenberg and Hagmann, 1997;Cubelli et al, 2000;Bartolo et al, 2001;Rumiati et al, 2001;Tessari et al, 2007), the range of possible dissociations between action execution and action understanding that can occur in apraxia is quite multifarious and cannot be explained by a mere action mirroring mechanism nor by a single lesion locus. Indeed, failures in imitating or in recognizing gestures may occur because of damage to a putative action semantics system or because of damage at any level in the process between perceiving (input lexicon) and performing (output lexicon) an action (Rothi et al, 1991;Cubelli et al, 2000).…”
Section: Seeing and Doing In Apraxiamentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Patients with apraxia may be impaired in executing both gestures that involve the use of objects (transitive), such as hammering a nail, and gestures not involving object use (intransitive), such as the hitchhiking sign (Cubelli et al, 2000). Although the impairment of meaningful (e.g., waving goodbye) and meaningless (e.g., moving a hand) gestures may be doubly dissociated (Goldenberg and Hagmann, 1997;Bartolo et al, 2001), apraxic patients often exhibit deficits in both types of gestures (Toraldo et al, 2001;Leiguarda, 2005), at least when presented in an intermingled list (Tessari et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When meaningful and meaningless gestures were presented intermingled, patients' ability to imitate either action types did not differ (see De Renzi et al 1980;Cubelli et al 2000;Toraldo et al 2001, for similar findings). However, when patients' ability to imitate was evaluated using separate lists, six patients had a selective imitation deficit for meaningless actions (see Goldenberg & Hagmann 1997;Peigneux et al 2000;Bartolo et al 2001, for similar results), and two had a selective imitation deficit for meaningful actions (see Bartolo et al 2001 for similar results). This study suggests that patients performing the imitation task in the mixed condition selected the non-semantic route because it allows the reproduction of all gestures and avoids high costs of switching between routes.…”
Section: The Dual Route Model and Other Accounts Of Imitationmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…While, in general, the production of transitive gestures seems to be affected more by left hemisphere lesions (Bartolo et al 2001;Tessari et al 2007), the ability to generate intransitive gestures can be equally disrupted by damage to either cerebral hemisphere (Buxbaum et al 2007). But, there are also studies suggesting that defective performance with both transitive and intransitive gestures is more likely to follow left than right hemisphere damage (Hanna-Pladdy et al 2001).…”
Section: Imitation Of Intransitive Gesturesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation