2018
DOI: 10.1101/445122
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Double-digest RAD-sequencing: do wet and dry protocol parameters impact biological results?

Abstract: 1 2 1 3 Running headline: 1 4 Impact of wet and dry protocol of ddRAD-seq 1 5 1 6 2 ABSTRACT 1 7 1 81. Next-generation sequencing technologies have opened a new era of research in genomics. 9Among these, restriction enzyme-based techniques such as restriction-site associated DNA 2 0 sequencing (RADseq) or double-digest RAD-sequencing (ddRADseq) are now widely used in 2 1 many population genomics fields. From DNA sampling to SNP calling, both wet and dry 2 2 protocols have been discussed in the literature to id… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using the ProcessMyRAD scripts (https://github.com/cumtr/PmR, Cumer et al, 2018), we also produced graphical outputs at the filtering step of the treatment, which allowed an evaluation of the experimental success for each individual. This method provides the proportion of retained reads after the first step of filtering, the number of reads by individuals, the quality of the sequencing and the proportion of the different nucleotides along the reads.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the ProcessMyRAD scripts (https://github.com/cumtr/PmR, Cumer et al, 2018), we also produced graphical outputs at the filtering step of the treatment, which allowed an evaluation of the experimental success for each individual. This method provides the proportion of retained reads after the first step of filtering, the number of reads by individuals, the quality of the sequencing and the proportion of the different nucleotides along the reads.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the ProcessMyRAD scripts (https://github.com/cumtr/PmR, Cumer et al . 2018), we also produced graphical outputs at the filtering step of the treatment, which allowed an evaluation of the experimental success for each library and individual.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NGS is particularly sensitive to low DNA quality, and vulnerable to errors which can emerge during the library preparation [71,72]. Our results suggest that laboratory errors can lead to genomic region/marker dropout, as in the case of our RADseq dataset, despite a satisfying number of reads per sample.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%