Double cropping effects on forage yield and the field water balance

Fouli, Ymene; Duiker, Sjoerd W.; Fritton, D. D.; Hall, M. H.; Watson, Jack; Johnson, David H.

doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2012.08.014

Cited by 26 publications

(26 citation statements)

References 45 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…After the harvest, the quantity of productive ear, seeds per ear, plant biomass and the thousand kernel weight (TKW) were tested for spring wheat yield evaluation [28] . For silage corn, the fresh weights of plant, leaf, stem and cluster were used as the yield indexes [29] .…”

Section: Growth Indexes and Yieldmentioning

confidence: 99%

Controlling threshold in soil salinity when planting spring wheat and sequential cropping silage corn in Northern Xinjiang using drip irrigation

Wang

Zhou

Lei

et al. 2018

International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Xinjiang Region of China is one of the most typical and representative arid areas worldwide, along with severe soil salinization issue. Planting spring wheat and sequential cropping silage corn in Northern Xinjiang using drip irrigation has become an effective way to relieve soil salinity stress, which improves the simple agricultural structure in the past and ensures food security in this area. However, neither the effects of different soil salinities on the growth and yield of spring wheat and silage corn, nor their desalination effect correspondingly was clear until now. Therefore, a pot experiment was conducted at Shihezi, Xinjiang from March to June 2015. The study aimed to establish the quantitative correlations between the parameters mentioned above and came up with the appropriate soil salinity threshold in Northern Xinjiang area. The results confirmed that the soils in all treatments were desalinated after the whole growth period, and the decreasing rates varied within 18.89%-44.08% and 11.06%-30.83% for two plants, which showed linear and quadratic correlations with initial soil salinity, respectively (R 2 >0.92**, p<0.05). Meanwhile, higher soil salinity would inhibit crop growth and yield, and the initial soil salinity also represented the negative quadratic correlations with growth parameters (R 2 >0.92**, p<0.01). The inhibition effect was enhanced with larger initial soil salinity. After the comprehensive consideration of soil salinity variation, crop growth and yield, the initial soil salinity was recommended under 8.91 g/kg and 5.54 g/kg to plant spring wheat and sequential cropping silage corn in Northern Xinjiang using drip irrigation.

show abstract

Section: Growth Indexes and Yieldmentioning

confidence: 99%

Controlling threshold in soil salinity when planting spring wheat and sequential cropping silage corn in Northern Xinjiang using drip irrigation

Wang

Zhou

Lei

et al. 2018

International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This effect was limited under the increasing drought conditions predicted by the Had3 scenario ( Figure S1), in which the water availability may be a limiting factor for plant growth. Experimental data of double cropping systems reported both higher water consumption (Meza et al, 2008) and invariant water content and higher yields (Fouli et al, 2012). It is clear that interactions and feedbacks between climate, rotations and carbon and nitrogen biogeochemical cycles are very complex, confirming the importance of developing a tool at high spatial resolution.…”

Section: Figmentioning

confidence: 99%

Potential carbon sequestration of European arable soils estimated by modelling a comprehensive set of management practices

Lugato

Bampa

Panagos

et al. 2014

Global Change Biology

212

122

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bottom-up estimates from long-term field experiments and modelling are the most commonly used approaches to estimate the carbon (C) sequestration potential of the agricultural sector. However, when data are required at European level, important margins of uncertainty still exist due to the representativeness of local data at large scale or different assumptions and information utilized for running models. In this context, a pan-European (EU + Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, Albania, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Norway) simulation platform with high spatial resolution and harmonized data sets was developed to provide consistent scenarios in support of possible carbon sequestration policies. Using the CENTURY agroecosystem model, six alternative management practices (AMP) scenarios were assessed as alternatives to the business as usual situation (BAU). These consisted of the conversion of arable land to grassland (and vice versa), straw incorporation, reduced tillage, straw incorporation combined with reduced tillage, ley cropping system and cover crops. The conversion into grassland showed the highest soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration rates, ranging between 0.4 and 0.8 t C ha À1 yr À1 , while the opposite extreme scenario (100% of grassland conversion into arable) gave cumulated losses of up to 2 Gt of C by 2100. Among the other practices, ley cropping systems and cover crops gave better performances than straw incorporation and reduced tillage. The allocation of 12 to 28% of the European arable land to different AMP combinations resulted in a potential SOC sequestration of 101-336 Mt CO 2 eq. by 2020 and 549-2141 Mt CO 2 eq. by 2100. Modelled carbon sequestration rates compared with values from an ad hoc meta-analysis confirmed the robustness of these estimates.

show abstract

“…). Cover crops are already recognized to have many benefits in traditional cropping systems such as preventing soil erosion, taking up excess N, providing habitat for beneficial insects, reducing soil compaction, and increasing water infiltration . Cereal crops typically require relatively high fertilizer inputs, but legume cover crops can add N to the system, reducing the N application needed for the following crop.…”

Section: Sustainable Intensification Strategies For Integrating Food mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Cover crops are already recognized to have many benefi ts in traditional cropping systems such as preventing soil erosion, taking up excess N, providing habitat for benefi cial insects, reducing soil compaction, and increasing water infi ltration. 33,34 Cereal crops typically require relatively high fertilizer inputs, 30,31 but legume cover crops can add N to the system, reducing the N application needed for the following crop. In a recent study, yields of three annual dual-use bioenergy crops, maize, sweet sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L), and forage sorghum, were 2 to 3 Mg ha -1 higher when following a legume cover crop, 32 leading to the conclusion that the additional N fi xed by the legume cover crops enhanced the biomass yield in these bioenergy crops.…”

Section: Temporal Intensifi Cationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Managing a second‐generation crop portfolio through sustainable intensification: Examples from the USA and the EU

Heaton

Schulte

Berti

et al. 2013

Biofuels Bioprod Bioref

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sustainable intensification of agricultural systems has been suggested – in addition to reducing waste and changing consumption habits – as a way to increase food, feed, fuel, and fiber security in the twenty‐first century. Here we describe three primary strategies of agricultural intensification – conventional intensification, temporal intensification, and spatial intensification – and how they can be used to manage and integrate food and second‐generation crop portfolios. While each strategy has individual merits, combining them to meet case‐specific targets may achieve optimum results. Multiple experiments and examples from the USA and the EU illustrate the potential of combining these approaches for agroecological intensification that can provide ecosystem services while maintaining or increasing economic output, thus striking a balance between ‘land sparing’ and ‘land sharing’. Management strategies will vary by the types of markets available, e.g., food, fuel and/or ecosystem services, and the scale of markets supplied, e.g., small heat and power vs. large cellulosic ethanol. Future research should holistically and methodologically evaluate the trade‐offs between different management strategies. © 2013 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd

show abstract

Double cropping effects on forage yield and the field water balance

Cited by 26 publications

References 45 publications

Controlling threshold in soil salinity when planting spring wheat and sequential cropping silage corn in Northern Xinjiang using drip irrigation

Controlling threshold in soil salinity when planting spring wheat and sequential cropping silage corn in Northern Xinjiang using drip irrigation

Potential carbon sequestration of European arable soils estimated by modelling a comprehensive set of management practices

Managing a second‐generation crop portfolio through sustainable intensification: Examples from the USA and the EU

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About