The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.11.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Double calibration: An accurate, reliable and easy-to-use method for 3D scapular motion analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
64
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in part because of the difficulties involved in obtaining in-vivo measurements of the scapular movement [Hill et al, 2007, Kontaxis et al, 2009. Recently, a number of studies have developed methods to obtain scapular kinematics in-vivo with relatively high accuracies [Brochard et al, 2011, Prinold et al, 2011, Shaheen et al, 2011a, Shaheen et al, 2011b, Warner et al, 2012.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in part because of the difficulties involved in obtaining in-vivo measurements of the scapular movement [Hill et al, 2007, Kontaxis et al, 2009. Recently, a number of studies have developed methods to obtain scapular kinematics in-vivo with relatively high accuracies [Brochard et al, 2011, Prinold et al, 2011, Shaheen et al, 2011a, Shaheen et al, 2011b, Warner et al, 2012.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tracking the acromion shows potential for estimating scapular movement. In the acromion method, either a magnetic sensor [7][8][9][10][11][12] or a photogrammetric marker cluster [13][14][15][16][17][18] is attached to the skin over the flat portion of the acromion, and scapula anatomical landmarks are calibrated with respect to a coordinate system fixed to the scapula. It has been shown that the acromion method accuracy is limited by the presence of soft tissue artifacts, especially when the full range of motion (ROM) of the gleno-humeral joint is explored [7,8,19,20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, various studies have investigated several factors associated with the use of acromion marker clusters (AMCs) and stereo-photogrammetry that may affect the overall accuracy: (a) the AMC design [13], (b) the shoulder posture selected for the scapula anatomical calibration [17], (c) the AMC attachment location [16], and d) the type of anatomical calibration (single or double) [15]. Moreover, AMC-based scapular motion has been compared to that obtained from skin-marker-based methods [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This idea is the basis of 40 techniques like the double calibration, whereby the motion of markers in the bone frame 41 is linearly interpolated between previously measured positions at the ends of the motion 42 cycle Brochard et al, 2011 To simplify the calculations, the proximal segment was considered to be fixed, so that 53 all the kinematic variables represent the relative motion of the distal segment, as seen in 54 the proximal reference frame. Quaternions were preferred to other ways of representing 55 rotations like matrices, Euler angles or orientation vectors, because they allowed more 56 compact mathematical models of CoR errors, although it would be possible to derive 57 such models from any other representation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%