1982
DOI: 10.1016/s0305-7372(82)80034-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Double-blind, randomized, crossover trial of nabilone vs. placebo in cancer chemotherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In four placebo controlled crossover trials preference for placebo was between 4% and 22%. 28 47 50 61 The difference in favour of cannabinoids was significant (table 2). In 14 active controlled crossover trials 3% to 46% of patients preferred the standard antiemetic.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In four placebo controlled crossover trials preference for placebo was between 4% and 22%. 28 47 50 61 The difference in favour of cannabinoids was significant (table 2). In 14 active controlled crossover trials 3% to 46% of patients preferred the standard antiemetic.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Four trials that have shown nabilone to be effective in treating chemotherapyrelated nausea and vomiting used a higher multi-dose regimen. [26][27][28][29] Patients received the first dose the night before the chemotherapy and the second and third doses before and after chemotherapy. Also, the drug doses (all used 2-mg doses) were higher than in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neidhart et al (1981); Sallan et al (1975) 3 studies The studies exposed dichotomic data on the partial anti-emetic efficacy, not total. Jones et al (1982); Levitt (1982); Wada et al (1982) 1 study…”
Section: Number Of Studies Reasonsmentioning
confidence: 99%