1997
DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1997.tb08898.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Double‐blind, randomized clinical trial for safety and efficacy of norfloxacin for shigellosis in children

Abstract: In a randomized, double-blind clinical trial, the efficacy and safety of norfloxacin were compared with nalidixic acid in the treatment of shigellosis in children. Out of 59 cases, Shigella spp. were isolated from 8 cases in the nalidixic acid group and 14 cases in the norfloxacin group. The norfloxacin group had significantly less duration of diarrhoea and presence of blood in stool as compared to the nalidixic acid group. No joint problem was encountered in this study at up to 4 months follow-up. Norfloxacin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…48 Gentamicin was found to be bacteriologically but not clinically inferior to nalidixic acid; 52 however, norfloxacin was clinically superior to nalidixic acid. 47 One study showed that cefixime was clinically superior to ampicillin plus sulbactam, 51 and another study showed that co-trimoxazole had better clinical, but not bacteriological, outcomes than ampicillin. 63 Finally, one study 45 reported that pivmecillinam was clinically and bacteriologically superior to nalidixic acid when cases with Shigella infections that are resistant to nalidixic acid were included.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…48 Gentamicin was found to be bacteriologically but not clinically inferior to nalidixic acid; 52 however, norfloxacin was clinically superior to nalidixic acid. 47 One study showed that cefixime was clinically superior to ampicillin plus sulbactam, 51 and another study showed that co-trimoxazole had better clinical, but not bacteriological, outcomes than ampicillin. 63 Finally, one study 45 reported that pivmecillinam was clinically and bacteriologically superior to nalidixic acid when cases with Shigella infections that are resistant to nalidixic acid were included.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite this, fluoroquinolones were extensively used for the treatment of shigellosis, as these drugs provide more effective care [47][48][49]. During mid-2002, outbreaks of dysentery due to S. dysenteriae type 1 were reported [50,51].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Clinical studies have underlined their safe use in adults and children (Bhattacharya et al, 1997;Salam et al, 1998). In this study, 30 % of the Shigella strains were resistant to fluoroquinolones and a S. boydii serotype 1 strain (G24371) was resistant to each of the four compounds tested (Table 2).…”
Section: Fluoroquinolone Resistance and Resistance Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 90%