2016
DOI: 10.1080/01691864.2016.1159981
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Double articulation analyzer with deep sparse autoencoder for unsupervised word discovery from speech signals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we briefly introduce NPB-DAA (Taniguchi et al, 2016b). Secondly, we describe DSAE-PBHL after introducing DSAE (Ng, 2011a;Liu et al, 2015;Taniguchi et al, 2016c).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we briefly introduce NPB-DAA (Taniguchi et al, 2016b). Secondly, we describe DSAE-PBHL after introducing DSAE (Ng, 2011a;Liu et al, 2015;Taniguchi et al, 2016c).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that, we excluded PCA-FP as a comparison method because of its poor ability to extract latent features with defects in previous experiments. To segment the time-series of driving behaviors, we employed a sticky hierarchical Dirichlet process hidden Markov model (sticky HDP-HMM) [ 33 ], which was used for segmenting driving behavior data in previous studies [ 8 , 21 , 34 , 35 ]. The RAW data and time-series of latent features extracted from D12 were used to train the sticky HDP-HMM.…”
Section: Application: Driving Behavior Segmentation With Defectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the above two studies included feature extraction for time-series analysis, those features were extracted by supervised learning models for respective tasks. We used an unsupervised learning method for feature extraction in this study, because, if the time-series of latent features extracted via an unsupervised learning method are able to represent driving behavior, they can support varied tasks including tasks based on the unsupervised method, e.g., time-series segmentation [ 21 ] and data visualization [ 22 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of language acquisition also constitute a constructive approach to the human developmental process (Cangelosi and Schlesinger, 2015 ), the language grounding (Steels and Hild, 2012 ), and the symbol emergence (Taniguchi et al, 2016c ). One approach to studying language acquisition focuses on the estimation of phonemes and words from speech signals (Goldwater et al, 2009 ; Heymann et al, 2014 ; Taniguchi et al, 2016d ). However, these studies used only continuous speech signals without using co-occurrence based on other sensor information, e.g., visual, tactile, and proprioceptive information.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%