2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2014.08.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Double adjacency graphs-based discriminant neighborhood embedding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Exploring new graph features is a persistent research focus in the graph data mining community, and many feature extraction methods have been proposed [13], [14]. Existing graph classification approaches can be roughly categorized into two groups: 1) distance based methods that include a pairwise similarity measure between two graphs, such as graph kernel [23], graph embedding [24], [25], [26], [27], graph matching [28], [29], and transformation [30], [31], [32]; and 2) subgraph feature based methods that identify significant subgraphs as signatures for one particular class. For example, the work in [33] proposed to the extraction of subgraph structural information for classification.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exploring new graph features is a persistent research focus in the graph data mining community, and many feature extraction methods have been proposed [13], [14]. Existing graph classification approaches can be roughly categorized into two groups: 1) distance based methods that include a pairwise similarity measure between two graphs, such as graph kernel [23], graph embedding [24], [25], [26], [27], graph matching [28], [29], and transformation [30], [31], [32]; and 2) subgraph feature based methods that identify significant subgraphs as signatures for one particular class. For example, the work in [33] proposed to the extraction of subgraph structural information for classification.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section we emphatically introduce three classical algorithms, MFA [ 10 ], LDNE [ 12 ] and DAG-DNE [ 13 ], which are related to our research point.…”
Section: Backgroudmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supervised algorithms conduct datasets with labels that aim to present better performance and low complexity. Linear discriminant analysis (LDA), local discriminant embedding (LDE) [ 7 ], discriminant sparse neighborhood preserving embedding (DSNPE) [ 8 ], regularized coplanar discriminant analysis (RCDA) [ 9 ], marginal Fisher analysis (MFA) [ 3 , 5 , 10 ], discriminant neighborhood embedding (DNE) [ 11 ], locality-based discriminant neighborhood embedding(LDNE) [ 12 ], and double adjacency graphs-based discriminant neighborhood embedding (DAG-DNE) [ 13 ] are typical supervised algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then it finds an optimal embedding such that the neighborhood structure can be preserved in the subspace. Recently, many discriminative versions of NPE have been proposed, such as neighbourhood preserving discriminant embedding (NPDE) [21] and double adjacency graphs-based discriminant neighborhood embedding (DAG-DNE) [22]. Different from NPE, where the nearest neighbors are manually choosen, SP-P [18,19] automatically constructs a graph.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%