1977
DOI: 10.1353/phl.1977.0022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dostoevsky, Camus, and Faulkner: Transcendence and Mutilation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Dostoevsky was one of the most important influences on Camus’ work, a point that has been noted by a number of critics (e.g. Trahan, 1966; Wasiolek, 1977; Natov, 1981). Camus acknowledged his debt to the great Russian novelist in a number of his non‐fiction writings.…”
Section: The Fall: Genesis Form and Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dostoevsky was one of the most important influences on Camus’ work, a point that has been noted by a number of critics (e.g. Trahan, 1966; Wasiolek, 1977; Natov, 1981). Camus acknowledged his debt to the great Russian novelist in a number of his non‐fiction writings.…”
Section: The Fall: Genesis Form and Contentmentioning
confidence: 99%