Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.09.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dosing patterns and costs of erythropoietic agents in patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis in managed care organizations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies have demonstrated differences in CKD costs based on the type of ESA used and the route of ESA administration. Epoetin treatment has been associated with lower average costs compared with darbepoetin [27,28] , while subcutaneous ESA use has been associated with lower average costs compared with intravenous administration [29] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have demonstrated differences in CKD costs based on the type of ESA used and the route of ESA administration. Epoetin treatment has been associated with lower average costs compared with darbepoetin [27,28] , while subcutaneous ESA use has been associated with lower average costs compared with intravenous administration [29] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several observational studies have described the dose relationship between EPO and darbepoetin alfa [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] ; however, many of these studies have significant methodological limitations, including not considering the same set of patients who were converted from EPO to darbepoetin alfa, not recognizing the non-proportional dose relationship between the two ESAs, and not adjusting for differences in the populations analyzed. In these studies, dose-only ratio (DOR) is reported, which is a ratio that compares the mean EPO dose in one population to the mean darbepoetin alfa dose in another population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have attempted to calculate a population-level single dose relationship value, described by previous investigators as a "dose ratio" (DR), using real-world observational data. [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] However, the majority of this work had significant methodological limitations because the underlying data do not represent the same patients who underwent conversion from one ESA to the other (Table 1). [16][17][18][19][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] In these studies, researchers used crosssectional designs to compare the mean epoetin alfa dose in one population with the mean darbepoetin alfa dose in another population-per administration, per week, per hospital stay, or cumulative dose per study period-without controlling for equivalent outcomes (Hb levels) or heterogeneity in patient populations.…”
Section: Note: This Article Is the Subject Of An Editorial That Appeamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] However, the majority of this work had significant methodological limitations because the underlying data do not represent the same patients who underwent conversion from one ESA to the other (Table 1). [16][17][18][19][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] In these studies, researchers used crosssectional designs to compare the mean epoetin alfa dose in one population with the mean darbepoetin alfa dose in another population-per administration, per week, per hospital stay, or cumulative dose per study period-without controlling for equivalent outcomes (Hb levels) or heterogeneity in patient populations. Another important factor that has not been addressed in reporting the dose relationship in nonconverted [16][17][18][19][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] and converted 20 (from one ESA to another) CKD patient populations is the nonproportional dose conversion relationship as a function of ESA dose and treatment stage (initiation versus maintenance).…”
Section: Note: This Article Is the Subject Of An Editorial That Appeamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation