2010
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/250/1/012012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dosimetric properties of MAGIC-fpolymer gel assessed to Radiotherapy clinical beams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The slope is approximately half of previous reports performed at lower fields (e.g. (Marques et al 2010)). Figure 2(b) shows D 95% ∆ for the R 2w measurement over the same range.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 50%
“…The slope is approximately half of previous reports performed at lower fields (e.g. (Marques et al 2010)). Figure 2(b) shows D 95% ∆ for the R 2w measurement over the same range.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 50%
“…A number of studies have used PENELOPE to evaluate the radiological water equivalence of different solid phantoms for low energy photons (Hill et al 2010, Marques et al 2010. The PENELOPE code has also been used for calculating the dosimetry data from kilovoltage x-ray beams including depth doses, profiles and BSFs as well as radial dose distributions from low energy brachytherapy sources (Assiamah et al 2007, Chica et al 2008, 2009, 2010, Croce et al 2012, Hill et al 2010, Ye et al 2004.…”
Section: Penelopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the MAGIC-f gel fusion point doubles if 1% of formaldehyde is used [28,33]. After 2008, the MAGIC-f gel with the atomic and chemical composition shown in Figure 3 was proposed and used by most of the studies, including that by T. Marques et al [34]. In the atomic composition (w/w), H (10.33%), O (62.68%), C (23.52%), N (2.52%), and others (0.81%) are used.…”
Section: Magic-gel Composition and Fabricationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the research on dose rate dependency reveals that the MAGICf gel shows no major variations of responses in different clinical dose rates which vary from 0.44 to 10 Gy/min, i.e., lower than 0.7% when X-rays are considered for evaluation and lower than 1.9% when all high-and low-energy beams (X-ray, γ-rays, photons, etc.) are produced from different accelerators [34]. Alva et al showed the effectiveness of MAGIC-f gel by using small fields in the dosimetric calculation in conformal radiation therapy; this cancer treatment shapes the radiation beam to tally the tumor shape; the effectiveness of MAGIC-f gel is predicted by Monte Carlo simulation, using PENELOPE, and experimentally by irradiating a MAGIC-f gel in phantom of 12 cm diameter and 18 cm height with 9 fields of 6 MV photon beam, each one of 1 × 1 cm2 with a total dose of 16 Gy, and reading the result via MRI [86].…”
Section: Application Of Magic-f Gelmentioning
confidence: 99%