2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2022.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dosimetric impact of target definition in brachytherapy for cervical cancer – Computed tomography and trans rectal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, abdominal ultrasound-guided needle insertion is susceptible to hindrance caused by factors, such as intestinal gas and obesity. TRUS-guided implant insertion and incorporating TRUS-based measurements for CT-based target volume contouring can significantly improve outcomes in centers with limited access to MRI [ 3 , 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, abdominal ultrasound-guided needle insertion is susceptible to hindrance caused by factors, such as intestinal gas and obesity. TRUS-guided implant insertion and incorporating TRUS-based measurements for CT-based target volume contouring can significantly improve outcomes in centers with limited access to MRI [ 3 , 16 , 17 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the above findings, it is advisable to combine physical examination and pre-BT MRI to improve CT-guided delineations [20,34]. Furthermore, enhanced CT and/or ultrasound may also reduce the variations in and dose impacts of target delineation [41,42]. Several consensuses have been issued for CT-guided target delineation [43][44][45].…”
Section: Ct-guided Contouring and Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In follow-up studies, they developed an optical tracking device as a reference structure to overcome limitations in anterior and cranial borders of CTV HR due to the limited probe length and its acoustic shadowing [78]. Swamidas et al [41] also reported no statistically significant differences in CTV HR and OARs between TRUS/CT-and MRI-based planning in 21 patients who received IC/IS or IC. However, the dosimetric and clinical outcome impacts of TRUS-guided BT in a large sample remain to be reported.…”
Section: Us-guided Bt: Promising and Low-costmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is only one study that compared clinical outcomes for MRI-only approach with hybrid CT/MRI-based approach, which found comparable cancer control and survival rates. Mahantshetty et al and a follow-up study by Swamidas et al have both demonstrated that the CT-based target incorporating real-time trans-rectal ultrasound information was comparable with MRI at the time of brachytherapy [35,36]. Given the wider availability of CT over MRI, a considerable amount of literature has been published recently by various groups on CT-based contouring consensus to enable more reliable and reproducible target volume delineation [37][38][39].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%