2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8140(01)00373-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dosimetric consequences of tumor mobility in radiotherapy of stage I non-small cell lung cancer – an analysis of data generated using ‘slow’ CT scans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The target volume corresponded to the internal target volume (ITV) in Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) 0403 phase II protocol [12]. The CT images already included the internal motion because long scan time (four seconds) CT under free breathing (what is called, "slow" CT scan) was used [13,14]. Spicula formation and pleural indentation were included within the ITV.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The target volume corresponded to the internal target volume (ITV) in Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) 0403 phase II protocol [12]. The CT images already included the internal motion because long scan time (four seconds) CT under free breathing (what is called, "slow" CT scan) was used [13,14]. Spicula formation and pleural indentation were included within the ITV.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CT images already included the internal motion because long scan time (four seconds) CT under free breathing (what is called, “slow” CT scan) was used [21, 22]. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lagerwaard et al (12) and van Sörnsen de Koste et al (13), on the basis of two helical CT scans and three "slow" CT scans, reported that planning target volumes derived by using slow CT consistently produced superior target coverage than did those from thin-section CT. On the other hand, attempts have been made at some institutions to avoid the influence of respiratory motion during radiation therapy by using active breathing control (14), breath holding (15), and real-time tumor tracking during radiation therapy (16). In some cases, these methods probably are effective for reducing the volume to be irradiated.…”
Section: Comparison Between Estimated and Visualized Internalmentioning
confidence: 99%