2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2009.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dosimetric Comparison of Helical Tomotherapy and Dynamic Conformal Arc Therapy in Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannomas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Improvement ratio: The ratio used to evaluate the improvement in the index between the two rival plans (a plan with a 2.5-mm MLC vs. a plan with a 5-mm MLC) [30]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improvement ratio: The ratio used to evaluate the improvement in the index between the two rival plans (a plan with a 2.5-mm MLC vs. a plan with a 5-mm MLC) [30]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent dosimetric studies, including the dose gradient analyses, have frequently dealt with the treatment techniques with nearly coplanar beam arrangements such as Helical tomotherapy [15][16][17][18] and volumetric modulated arc therapy. 19) The arc arrangement of the RapidArc plan with two arcs, as reported by Mayo et al,20) was similar to the "3 arcs (a)" plan shown in Fig.…”
Section: Effect Of Planning Methods On the Gi Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The non-coplanar DCA plans have been shown to represent a better dose gradient than the Helical tomotherapy plans in SRS plans for skull-base tumors. 16,17) The DCA technique has a great freedom for the arc arrangement and would be therefore more advantageous for attaining the steep dose gradient than the coplanar beam delivery systems. Planners must arrange the arc positions to attain the better dose gradient in addition to the better target coverage and conformity.…”
Section: Effect Of Planning Methods On the Gi Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improvement ratio: The ratio used to evaluate the improvement in the index between the two plans (a 2.5-mm MLC plan vs. 5-mm MLC plan) [39]. Improvement ratio(%)=|Index2.5mm MLCIndex5mm MLC|Index5mm MLC×100(%)…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%