2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2015.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dosimetric comparison of brachyablation and stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy in the treatment of liver metastasis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, many of the lesions in our series were either close to major vessels, close to other critical structures, and/or had a large diameter – all issues that can limit the appropriateness of either EBRT or interventional radiology-ablation techniques [ 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ]. In a recent dosimetric study comparing stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and IG-HDR plans for liver lesions, investigators found that IG-HDR could provide intra-tumoral dose escalation and decreased low dose spill to surrounding tissues [ 35 ]. On the other hand, for small lesions, SBRT may be preferred.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, many of the lesions in our series were either close to major vessels, close to other critical structures, and/or had a large diameter – all issues that can limit the appropriateness of either EBRT or interventional radiology-ablation techniques [ 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ]. In a recent dosimetric study comparing stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and IG-HDR plans for liver lesions, investigators found that IG-HDR could provide intra-tumoral dose escalation and decreased low dose spill to surrounding tissues [ 35 ]. On the other hand, for small lesions, SBRT may be preferred.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, some researchers reported that SBT is also a safe and effective modality for the treatment of inoperable early stage NSCLC[ 8 10 ]. Pennington JD et al compared the dosimetric differences between brachytherapy and SBRT in the treatment of liver metastasis[ 23 ]. In their study, brachytherapy led to a higher target dose, a similar dose to OARs, but potentially had lower target coverage compared with SBRT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As normal tissue toxicity after repeated full course of conventional EBRT has shown to be significant, it seems reasonable to assume that further improvements in the therapeutic ratio can be generated by escalating the treatment dose while ameliorating conformity. [50][51][52][53][54][55][56] Up to now, however, no investigations have been performed for comparison of SBRT, nonstereotactic IMRT, and image-based interstitial brachytherapy for the reirradiation of extensive recurrent head and neck cancer. At this point, the intrinsic characteristic of HDR to generate high intratarget dosing is of particular importance, as it facilitates the application of ablative doses to central tumor volumes that are thought to experience increased radioresistance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to SBRT, however, HDR provides a higher degree of intratarget dose heterogeneity with no upper dose limits and a sharper dose fall-off gradient outside the target volume with a lower low-dose spill. [50][51][52][53][54][55][56] Up to now, however, no investigations have been performed for comparison of SBRT, nonstereotactic IMRT, and image-based interstitial brachytherapy for the reirradiation of extensive recurrent head and neck cancer. Against this background, the presented cases underpin the potential of brachytherapy to provide local tumor control in unresectable recurrent ENT malignancies in which repeat EBRT is only feasible to a limited extend.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%