2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2014.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dosimetric characterization of the Exradin W1 plastic scintillator detector through comparison with an in-house developed scintillator system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
32
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
6
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results are compared with those obtained with other detectors we already use for small photon beam dosimetry, contributing to complement data that can be found in the literature, 24,[27][28][29] in particular regarding the behaviour of these detectors in smallfield beam dosimetry required for TPS commissioning (PDD, dose profile and OF measurements).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results are compared with those obtained with other detectors we already use for small photon beam dosimetry, contributing to complement data that can be found in the literature, 24,[27][28][29] in particular regarding the behaviour of these detectors in smallfield beam dosimetry required for TPS commissioning (PDD, dose profile and OF measurements).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…27,28,42 We did not take into account detector energy and temperature dependence, which would allow achieving uncertainties lower than those found.…”
Section: 4mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(a)]. Other studies have shown the dose rate to have an insignificant effect on the response of the Exradin W1 detector, which leaves changes in the measured spectral shape as the likely cause of the CLR trends. However, it is difficult to quantify these changes as the photodetector used in the R&D W1 only measures the spectral intensity in two broad spectral regions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that the Exradin W1 proved to be a reliable tool for small field dosimetry applications such as RT beams commissioning and quality checks 1,29,30) thanks to its water-equivalence. However, the approach adopted for stem effect correction is very sensitive to the irradiation set up [31][32][33][34] .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%