2017
DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dose, schedule, safety, and efficacy of guadecitabine in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia

Abstract: BACKGROUNDOutcomes for patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are poor. Guadecitabine, a next‐generation hypomethylating agent, could be useful in treating such patients.METHODSIn this multicenter, open‐label, phase 2 dose‐expansion study, AML patients from 10 North American medical centers were first randomized (1:1) to receive subcutaneous guadecitabine at 60 or 90 mg/m2 on 5 consecutive days in each 28‐day cycle (5‐day regimen). Subsequently, another cohort was treated for 10 days… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
43
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
43
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…1 When patients who achieved a complete response with an incomplete count recovery were added, the response rate increased, but the median duration of the complete response was short, and this is consistent with the historically refractory nature of AML in this patient population. Earlier studies with guadecitabine produced generally similar results, 6,7 with higher response rates in previously untreated patients.…”
supporting
confidence: 57%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…1 When patients who achieved a complete response with an incomplete count recovery were added, the response rate increased, but the median duration of the complete response was short, and this is consistent with the historically refractory nature of AML in this patient population. Earlier studies with guadecitabine produced generally similar results, 6,7 with higher response rates in previously untreated patients.…”
supporting
confidence: 57%
“…The results reported by Roboz et al 1 are of interest but are not decidedly better than what might have been achieved with other chemotherapy approaches. In phase 2 studies and even randomized studies in this group of higher risk MDS/AML patients, selection factors are a major impediment when one is trying to compare results from different trials.…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, compared to decitabine, guadecitabine is able to resist cytidine deaminase‐mediated degradation of decitabine, which prolongs its half‐life. In a phase II study, 103 patients with relapsed/refractory AML received either a 5‐ or 10‐day guadecitabine regimen . Fifty patients received 60 or 90 mg/m 2 /day in the 5‐day regimen, and 53 patients received 60 mg/m 2 /day in the 10‐day regimen.…”
Section: Pipeline Agentsmentioning
confidence: 99%