2021
DOI: 10.3390/toxins13020086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dose–Response Study of Microcystin Congeners MCLA, MCLR, MCLY, MCRR, and MCYR Administered Orally to Mice

Abstract: Microcystins are common freshwater cyanobacterial toxins that affect liver function. The toxicities of five microcystin congeners (microcystin-LA (MCLA), MCLR, MCLY, MCRR, and MCYR) commonly observed in harmful algal blooms (HABs) were evaluated in BALB/c mice after a single oral administration of doses ranging from those that were no observed adverse effect levels (NOAELs) to lowest observed adverse effect levels (LOAELs). Animals were monitored for changes in behavior and appearance, and euthanized 24 h afte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Toxicological studies suggest that MCs with hydrophilic amino acid groups (e.g., MCRR) appear to be less toxic, while MCs with hydrophobic l -amino acids appear to be more toxic (e.g., MCLR) (Table S7). The trend appears to be similar to the CR values of MCLR and MCRR from the ADDA-ELISA tests (Table S4). However, toxicity studies on most MC variants are still very limited; therefore, it is unclear whether a correlation can be developed between cross-reactivity and toxicity.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Toxicological studies suggest that MCs with hydrophilic amino acid groups (e.g., MCRR) appear to be less toxic, while MCs with hydrophobic l -amino acids appear to be more toxic (e.g., MCLR) (Table S7). The trend appears to be similar to the CR values of MCLR and MCRR from the ADDA-ELISA tests (Table S4). However, toxicity studies on most MC variants are still very limited; therefore, it is unclear whether a correlation can be developed between cross-reactivity and toxicity.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Because of this, the differences in hepatotoxicity endpoints in vivo generally mirror the variations in MCLR standard concentrations (results in Table 2 ). The liver score (defined in Section 4.2.2 ), which assesses the gross appearance of the liver at the time of necropsy [ 10 , 11 ], consistently increased with MCLR dose concentrations and reached significance with males in vendor groups B-G (MCLR dose ≥ 25.6 µg/kg) and females in vendor groups A-G (MCLR dose ≥ 13.2 µg/kg) compared to the controls ( Figure 2 A). The liver/body weight is used as opposed to liver weight alone to normalize for varying body weights.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All necropsies were done experimenter blind. Necropsies were performed immediately after blood collection, and a gross assessment of liver appearance was recorded and then converted to a liver score [ 10 , 11 ]. The liver score was based on presence/severity of lesions and extent of liver surface area affected.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations