2002
DOI: 10.1017/s0950268801006446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dose-response relationships for foot and mouth disease in cattle and sheep

Abstract: The relationships between the inhaled dose of foot and mouth disease virus and the outcomes of infection and disease were examined by fitting dose-response models to experimental data. The parameters for both the exponential and beta-poisson models were estimated using maximum likelihood and Bayesian methods. The median probability of infection given a single inhaled TCID50 was estimated to be 0.031 with 95% Bayesian credibility intervals (CI) of 0.018-0.052 for cattle, and 0.045 (CI = 0.024-0.080) for sheep. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
43
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the relationship between challenge dose and progression to infectiousness has not been fully quantified. Dose-dependent or age-dependent response to infection is common for many pathogens, including MAP [8][9][10]. Previous work with other pathogens illustrates the potential impact of changes to pathogenesis due to age at exposure subsequently resulting in a change in infection transmission dynamics in a population [11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the relationship between challenge dose and progression to infectiousness has not been fully quantified. Dose-dependent or age-dependent response to infection is common for many pathogens, including MAP [8][9][10]. Previous work with other pathogens illustrates the potential impact of changes to pathogenesis due to age at exposure subsequently resulting in a change in infection transmission dynamics in a population [11].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For some infections data suggests that severity of disease increases with intimacy of contact or, more generally, with the intensity of exposure to the infectious agent (e.g. measles [26], polio [20], foot-and-mouth disease [8,2]). But dose of exposure may also be important for subsequent infectiousness as suggested by experiments on bovine tuberculosis [18,19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is good documentation on dose-response relationships from experimental studies in terms of infection, disease, and immunity. The majority of such empirical studies conclude that there is a minimal dose required to induce a response, and above this threshold the probability of response increases nonlinearly with the dose of exposure [8,18]. To incorporate this observation into a model of transmission we need a scheme that processes the shedding and spread of infectious agent to determine the average dose challenging a susceptible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metz et al 1982 amongst many others). However, the steady increase in popularity of the Bayesian methodology (Clark 2005) has prompted substantial interest in implementing it in the D-R and exposure risk assessment settings (e.g., French et al 2002;Teunis et al 2002;Englehardt 2004;Englehardt & Swartout. 2004, 2006Mutshinda et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%