2019
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-6359-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dose-response relation of self-reported and accelerometer-measured physical activity to perceived health in middle age—the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 Study

Abstract: BackgroundRegular physical activity (PA) promotes health and decreases mortality. The positive relationship between PA and perceived health (PH) is well known. However, previous research in the field has often used self-reported PA measures. The aim of this population-based NFBC1966 birth cohort study was to assess the relationship between both self-reported and objectively measured PA and PH in midlife.MethodsA sample group of 6384 participants (2878 men, 3506 women, response rate 62%) aged 46 completed a que… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
36
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison with various accelerometry‐based methods, the threshold <2 MET for Polar Active provided similar results as threshold <100 counts per minute (cpm) for ActiGraph, and the mean difference between methods was 7.0 min/day (95% confidence interval from −17.8 to 31.7 min/d) 21 . Total PA volume including all activity performed with intensity of 2 METs or higher was calculated by multiplying each MET value with its duration (total PA, MET min/d) 16 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In comparison with various accelerometry‐based methods, the threshold <2 MET for Polar Active provided similar results as threshold <100 counts per minute (cpm) for ActiGraph, and the mean difference between methods was 7.0 min/day (95% confidence interval from −17.8 to 31.7 min/d) 21 . Total PA volume including all activity performed with intensity of 2 METs or higher was calculated by multiplying each MET value with its duration (total PA, MET min/d) 16 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The day on which the participant received the activity monitor was excluded from the analysis. Participants with at least four valid days were included in the analyses, and daily averages of duration spent in five activity levels (min/day) were calculated 16 . Criteria for a valid day were defined as at least 600 min/d (without considering them being consecutive minutes) monitoring time during waking hours 17,18 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Excluding participants with metabolic diseases and medications affecting autonomic function and those who were unable to carry out the CRF test might have induced selection bias to the study sample. In our previous study, we did not find significant differences in health characteristics between groups of participants with or without valid PA data …”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…In our previous study, we did not find significant differences in health characteristics between groups of participants with or without valid PA data. 42…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Energy expenditure (EE) during exercise training has been determined, and good correlation (R 2 = 0.74) between the Polar Active and the doubly labeled water technique has been found previously [25,27]. Participants with at least four valid days were included in the analysis [28]. If at least 600 min/day, i.e.…”
Section: Physical Activity Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%