Dose-response patterns for vibration-induced white finger

Abstract

Aims: To investigate alternative relations between cumulative exposures to hand-transmitted vibration (taking account of vibration magnitude, lifetime exposure duration, and frequency of vibration) and the development of white finger (Raynaud's phenomenon). Methods: Three previous studies have been combined to provide a group of 1557 users of powered vibratory tools in seven occupational subgroups: stone grinders, stone carvers, quarry drillers, dockyard caulkers, dockyard boilermakers, dockyard painters, and forest workers. The estimated total operating duration in hours was thus obtained for each subject, for each tool, and for all tools combined. From the vibration magnitudes and exposure durations, seven alternative measurements of cumulative exposure were calculated for each subject, using expressions of the form: dose = ∑a m i t i , where a i is the acceleration magnitude on tool i, t i is the lifetime exposure duration for tool i, and m = 0, 1, 2, or 4. Results: For all seven alternative dose measures, an increase in dose was associated with a significant increase in the occurrence of vibration-induced white finger, after adjustment for age and smoking. However, dose measures with high powers of acceleration (m > 1) faired less well than measures in which the weighted or unweighted acceleration, and lifetime exposure duration, were given equal weight (m = 1). Dose determined solely by the lifetime exposure duration (without consideration of the vibration magnitude) gave better predictions than measures with m greater than unity. All measures of dose calculated from the unweighted acceleration gave better predictions than the equivalent dose measures using acceleration frequency-weighted according to current standards. Conclusions: Since the total duration of exposure does not discriminate between exposures accumulated over the day and those accumulated over years, a linear relation between vibration magnitude and exposure duration seems appropriate for predicting the occurrence of vibration-induced white finger. Poorer predictions were obtained when the currently recommended frequency weighting was employed than when accelerations at all frequencies were given equal weight. Findings suggest that improvements are possible to both the frequency weighting and the time dependency used to predict the development of vibration-induced white finger in current standards.O ccupational exposures to hand-transmitted vibration result in various disorders, sometimes collectively known as the "hand-arm vibration syndrome". The syndrome includes vascular, neurological, and musculoskeletal disorders that may become manifest individually or collectively. The precise conditions causing each of these disorders are not known. However, for the best known vascular disorder, vibration-induced white finger (VWF), several studies have reported the vibration conditions associated with an observed incidence, or prevalence, of the condition.In 1986, an annex to International Standard 5349 included a dose-response relation between the...

Frequency Weightings Based on Biodynamics of Fingers-Hand-Arm System

“…A recent study 34) indicated that the unweighted acceleration was better than the ISO-weighted acceleration for the assessment of the vibration-induced white finger. Because the major vibration components of most powered hand tools are equal to or less than 250 Hz 31) , the finger TAB-weighted acceleration is highly correlated to the unweighted acceleration, as presented in Table 1.…”

Recent Advances in Biodynamics of Human Hand-Arm System

“…Hence, the finger TAB weighting method is consistent with the unweighted acceleration method, which is recommended by NIOSH as an alternative method for finger risk assessment 59) . A recent epidemiological study also reported that the unweighted acceleration was better than ISOweighted acceleration for predicting VWF 60) . Another recent application of the transmitted vibration is to check the dc-shift of the acceleration signal 61) .…”

New Frequency Weighting of Hand-Arm Vibration

“…Since the 1980's, some investigators have pointed out that the method overestimates the low frequency effect and others have pointed out an underestimation of the high frequency effect [2][3][4][5] . We need a new method of frequency weighting that is medically proven.…”