2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01067.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dose‐Response Models for Inhalation of Bacillus anthracis Spores: Interspecies Comparisons

Abstract: Because experiments with Bacillus anthracis are costly and dangerous, the scientific, public health, and engineering communities are served by thorough collation and analysis of experiments reported in the open literature. This study identifies available dose-response data from the open literature for inhalation exposure to B. anthracis and, via dose-response modeling, characterizes the response of nonhuman animal models to challenges. Two studies involving four data sets amenable to dose-response modeling wer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
81
5
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(41 reference statements)
5
81
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 1A shows the data and exponential fit (r f = 0.070, p-value = 0.47 representing a good fit to the data) giving an ID 50 (ie, the dose at which there is a 50% probability of infection) of *10 organisms with approximately 7% of individuals inhaling 1 organism likely being infected. The commonly used 2-parameter beta-Poisson and log-probit models 20 did not provide sufficiently better fits to the data over the exponential model to justify the extra parameter. Primate data also support this high level of infectivity at low doses.…”
Section: Infectious Dosementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 1A shows the data and exponential fit (r f = 0.070, p-value = 0.47 representing a good fit to the data) giving an ID 50 (ie, the dose at which there is a 50% probability of infection) of *10 organisms with approximately 7% of individuals inhaling 1 organism likely being infected. The commonly used 2-parameter beta-Poisson and log-probit models 20 did not provide sufficiently better fits to the data over the exponential model to justify the extra parameter. Primate data also support this high level of infectivity at low doses.…”
Section: Infectious Dosementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These authors also considered the Saslaw et al 16 results alone due to complications arising from pooling multiple data-sets. 20 Here, we similarly restrict our analysis to the Saslaw et al results, since this is the only data-set to include multiple low-dose responses, which are important for our subsequent hazard assessments. Unlike Jones et al, we used the 1-parameter exponential model to fit the data, because it is the simplest relationship that can be derived from basic biological considerations 20 such that:…”
Section: Infectious Dosementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent evaluation of dose-response data for B. anthracis spores through the inhalation exposure route found that the dose-response relationship could be modeled by the exponential equation (4) P͑d͒ ϭ 1 Ϫ e Ϫkd where P(d) is the probability of death (P) (when untreated) at dose d, and k is the probability that one organism will survive to initiate the response (4). In this study, a k value generated from a pooled guinea pig and rhesus monkey data set was used.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the authors did not provide a direct verification of the biological validity of the models with in vivo pathogen growth. This study aimed at such verification with data from monkey, which has been considered the animal model that most closely mimics inhalational diseases in humans and which was used in past dose-response studies for category A agents (3,17). Open literature was searched for survival doseresponse data and bacterial viable count data for monkeys infected by F. tularensis via the inhalation route.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%