2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41386-020-0779-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dose-response effects of d-amphetamine on effort-based decision-making and reinforcement learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
3
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the inclusion of statistical images partly offsets this issue, the number of included studies still limited our ability to further explore the effects of potential moderators, such as effort type (i.e., physical vs. cognitive), parameter type (i.e., difference in SV vs. SV of one option), effort execution requirement (i.e., real vs. hypothetical), and reward probability (i.e., cumulative vs. random payout). Because effort-based decision-making is sensitive to reward probability (Barch et al, 2014;Soder et al, 2020;Treadway et al, 2012) and opportunity costs (Otto and Daw, 2019), future research should directly explore the interaction between effort demand and other cost domains and/or task features. Second, the majority of the included studies focused on physical effort measured by handgrip devices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the inclusion of statistical images partly offsets this issue, the number of included studies still limited our ability to further explore the effects of potential moderators, such as effort type (i.e., physical vs. cognitive), parameter type (i.e., difference in SV vs. SV of one option), effort execution requirement (i.e., real vs. hypothetical), and reward probability (i.e., cumulative vs. random payout). Because effort-based decision-making is sensitive to reward probability (Barch et al, 2014;Soder et al, 2020;Treadway et al, 2012) and opportunity costs (Otto and Daw, 2019), future research should directly explore the interaction between effort demand and other cost domains and/or task features. Second, the majority of the included studies focused on physical effort measured by handgrip devices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Excluding these two individuals did not change the pattern of results. Two other participants were excluded from all analyses of the EEfRT, as they chose the low effort task on all trials at all sessions (this is consistent with our exclusion criteria in previous uses of this task in repeated measures studies (Wardle et al 2011 ; Soder et al 2021 ). Therefore, all analyses reflect a sample size of 58.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Typical cannabis effect scales, including the one used here, contain items such as “Things around me seem more pleasing than usual” and “I feel as if something pleasant had just happened to me,” so it is possible cannabis satisfies some need for reward, reducing motivation for other, non-drug rewards. However, stimulants such as amphetamine also produce euphoria, yet increase exertion of effort for other rewards (Wardle et al 2011 ; Soder et al 2021 ). It is also possible that cannabis operates on perceptions of effort, making costs appear higher rather than rewards lower.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations