2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2009.01.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dose–response effects of chitosans on in vitro rumen digestion and fermentation of mixtures differing in forage-to-concentrate ratios

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
27
2
9

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
7
27
2
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The nutritive value of the experimental substrates varied depending on the F:C ratio, as shown for the levels of CP (87-190 g/kg) and NDF (385-702 g/kg) (Table 1). However, methane production was not clearly affected by the F:C ratio alone, which is in agreement with that reported by Goiri et al (2009). for fattening or dairying).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The nutritive value of the experimental substrates varied depending on the F:C ratio, as shown for the levels of CP (87-190 g/kg) and NDF (385-702 g/kg) (Table 1). However, methane production was not clearly affected by the F:C ratio alone, which is in agreement with that reported by Goiri et al (2009). for fattening or dairying).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our results show that chitosan had a tendency to decrease IVDMD; however, this was significantly decreased only in the high forage diet. A reduction of in vitro digestibility for maize silage diet and a different forage-concentrate diet with chitosan (325, 750, and 1500 mg/L of culture fluid) has also been observed previously (3)(4)(5). A slight decrease in the digestibility in sheep given chitosan (136 mg/kg of BW) daily via rumen fistula has also been reported (6).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Although the negative effects of chitosan on the rumen ciliate protozoa population could be useful, such effects on rumen bacteria, with the consequent decrease in dry matter digestibility, would be harmful. The use of chitosan in ruminant diets influences rumen fermentation processes both in vitro and in vivo (3)(4)(5)(6), and it can also inhibit in vitro rumen biohydrogenation when fat sources are included (7). Rumen ciliate protozoa play an important role in increasing the concentration of conjugated linoleic acid (cis9, trans11C 18:2 ; c9, t11-CLA) and trans-vaccenic acid (trans11C 18:1 ; TVA) in the rumen fluid (8,9), and their alteration by chitosan or by a combination of both additives (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lower C2:C3 ratio has already been reported in response to chitosan (Goiri et al, 2009a(Goiri et al, ,b, 2010. This increase in propionate (7%) and reduction in acetate (2%) proportion can be associated with changes in the carbohydrate digestion without altering DMI when chitosan was added in the rumen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…On the other hand, when added to the diet of sheep, chitosan increased propionate proportion without affecting OM digestibility (Goiri et al, 2010). Thus, chitosan might alter ruminal fermentation for more energetically efficient patterns and may provide an alternative to antimicrobial growth promoters (Goiri et al, 2009a(Goiri et al, ,b, 2010; nevertheless, more in vivo studies are necessary to identify the effect of chitosan on ruminal fermentation. Therefore, this study was aimed to evaluate the effects of chitosan on dry matter intake (DMI), nutrient digestibility, ruminal fermentation and blood metabolites in Nellore steers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%