Dose Reconstruction for the Million Worker Study

Abstract

The primary aim of the epidemiologic study of one million U.S. radiation workers and veterans [the Million Worker Study (MWS)] is to provide scientifically valid information on the level of radiation risk when exposures are received gradually over time, and not within seconds as was the case for Japanese atomic-bomb survivors. The primary outcome of the epidemiologic study is cancer mortality but other causes of death such as cardiovascular disease and cerebrovascular disease will be evaluated. The success of the study is tied to the validity of the dose reconstruction approaches to provide realistic estimates of organ-specific radiation absorbed doses that are as accurate and precise as possible and to properly evaluate their accompanying uncertainties. The dosimetry aspects for the MWS are challenging in that they address diverse exposure scenarios for diverse occupational groups being studied over a period of up to 70 y. The dosimetric issues differ among the varied exposed populations that are considered: atomic veterans, U.S. Department of Energy workers exposed to both penetrating radiation and intakes of radionuclides, nuclear power plant workers, medical radiation workers, and industrial radiographers. While a major source of radiation exposure to the study population comes from external gamma- or x-ray sources, for some of the study groups there is a meaningful component of radionuclide intakes that require internal radiation dosimetry assessments. Scientific Committee 6–9 has been established by the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) to produce a report on the comprehensive organ dose assessment (including uncertainty analysis) for the MWS. The NCRP dosimetry report will cover the specifics of practical dose reconstruction for the ongoing epidemiologic studies with uncertainty analysis discussions and will be a specific application of the guidance provided in NCRP Report Nos. 158, 163, 164, and 171. The main role of the Committee is to provide guidelines to the various groups of dosimetrists involved in the MWS to ensure that certain dosimetry criteria are considered: calculation of annual absorbed doses in the organs of interest, separation of low and high linear-energy transfer components, evaluation of uncertainties, and quality assurance and quality control. It is recognized that the MWS and its approaches to dosimetry are a work in progress and that there will be flexibility and changes in direction as new information is obtained, both with regard to dosimetry and with regard to the epidemiologic features of the study components. This manuscript focuses on the description of the various components of the MWS, on the available dosimetry results, and on the challenges that have been encountered. It is expected that the Committee will complete its report in 2016.

Estimation of Radiation Doses to U.S. Military Test Participants from Nuclear Testing: A Comparison of Historical Film-Badge Measurements, Dose Reconstruction and Retrospective Biodosimetry

“…Their methodology attempts to determine the scenario of exposure for each individual military test participant using all available information, and then calculates a dose and an estimated uncertainty without the high-sided bias often present in the compensation programs. Following up on that work, Beck et al (5) estimated bone marrow and male breast doses to ;2,000 exposed military test participants, representing a subset of a ;115,000 military participants being studied as part of the One-Million U.S. Workers and Veterans Study of Low-Dose Radiation Health Effects (4). The red bone marrow (RBM) doses for the subcohort described in (5) averaged approximately 6 mGy and the maximum calculated RBM dose for that study was 108 mGy.…”

Evaluating biomarkers to model cancer risk post cosmic ray exposure

“…Currently, the dominant uncertainty in space radiation risk assessment is associated with radiation quality followed by dose rate effects ( Cucinotta et al, 2012 ). While studies like the ongoing million worker ( Bouville et al, 2015 ) will shrink uncertainties for low-LET radiation including those from dose rate effects, the overall achievable limit on uncertainty reduction for high-LET radiation based on scaling from low-LET radiation studies and adding in empirical radiation quality and dose rate modifiers is below NASA’s current target. To overcome this barrier, NASA has developed an aggressive plan ( Roadmap NHRP ) to leverage a mechanistic understanding of radiation effects to develop models with better predictive capability.…”

Capturing Opportunities and Meeting Challenges in Radiation Protection

“…Andre Bouville informed us about this major NCRP project undertaken by SC 6-9 (Bouville et al 2015). The resulting report will stimulate approaches to dosimetry that will require flexibility and changes in direction as new information is obtained with regard both to dosimetry and to the epidemiological features of the study components.…”