2009
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-97332009000300009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dose rate influence on deep dose deposition using a 6 MV x-ray beam from a linear accelerator

Abstract: Linear accelerators used in radiation therapy treatments usually provide the capability of irradiating with different dose rates. The medical physicist may choose arbitrary the dose rate to use, although the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) varies with this physical parameter. In this work the measurements of absorbed dose of the x-ray beams from a Varian 6 MV linear accelerator CLINAC 600C/D were made in a water phantom, using an appropriate dosimetry system, consisting of an electrometer and a waterpr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present study, Varian Clinac 600C LINAC computer-controlled equipment with a conventional X-rays source was used. This machine generates a 6 MV X-rays beam with rectangular symmetric fields [18] and delivers the exact prescribed dose to the patient in the lowest number of monitor units. The irradiation of samples was performed in a water phantom according to IAEA TRS 398 dosimetry protocols [19] at a source-surface distance of 100 cm with a (30 cm × 30 cm) field in order to simulate the standard conditions of cancer treatment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, Varian Clinac 600C LINAC computer-controlled equipment with a conventional X-rays source was used. This machine generates a 6 MV X-rays beam with rectangular symmetric fields [18] and delivers the exact prescribed dose to the patient in the lowest number of monitor units. The irradiation of samples was performed in a water phantom according to IAEA TRS 398 dosimetry protocols [19] at a source-surface distance of 100 cm with a (30 cm × 30 cm) field in order to simulate the standard conditions of cancer treatment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, Varian Clinac 600C LINAC computer-controlled equipment with a conventional X-ray source was used. This machine generates a 6 MV X-ray beam with rectangular symmetric fields [11] and delivers the exact prescribed dose to the patient in the lowest number of monitoring units. The irradiation of samples was performed in a water phantom according to IAEA TRS 398 dosimetry protocols [16] at a source-surface distance of 100 cm with a (30 × 30) cm 2 field in order to maintain the chief conditions of cancer treatment.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When these mistakes occur, they can be fatal; it is critical to prevent such errors in this extremely important field. Previous work by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine and the American Society of Radiation Oncology supports the view that "error reporting systems should be developed in radiation therapy" to "protect the safety of each and every patient" [8][9][10][11]. From this point of view, an easy-to-use, easy-to-read and low-cost dosimeter, that is also more accessible to people in places with limited resources, may ensure that every treatment will be as safe as possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The linear accelerators used for medical therapy usually operate on a dose rate around 1 Gy•min −1 [40]. If we assume a typical phantom mass of 1 kilogram and a typical electron beam final energy of 6 MeV, the required average beam current is 2.8 nA.…”
Section: (A19)mentioning
confidence: 99%