2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2014.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dose Optimization in Lumbar Spine Radiographic Examination by Air Gap Method at CR and DR Systems: A Phantom Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From here, subsequent manipulations were made to produce images with lower dose. The manipulated SDD ranged from 100 to 150 cm as proposed by European Commission guidelines, being selected the extremes and a middle value (130 cm) to verify if differences on IQ and dose were noticeable [3,7,8,14,20]. The tube potentials varied from 75, 85, and 95 kVp as suggested in multiple studies previously performed [2,3,7,20,21] and also by the European Commission guidelines [20].…”
Section: Phase 1: Image Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…From here, subsequent manipulations were made to produce images with lower dose. The manipulated SDD ranged from 100 to 150 cm as proposed by European Commission guidelines, being selected the extremes and a middle value (130 cm) to verify if differences on IQ and dose were noticeable [3,7,8,14,20]. The tube potentials varied from 75, 85, and 95 kVp as suggested in multiple studies previously performed [2,3,7,20,21] and also by the European Commission guidelines [20].…”
Section: Phase 1: Image Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highest reported effective dose (ED) for this examination was 1.5 mSv [2][3][4], which is considered a high-radiation exposure, when compared to the average annual background radiation dose of 2 mSv received by the Australian population [5]. This high dose level is mainly related to the exposure settings, considering that examination is performed in one of the body areas that has the highest x-ray attenuation, thus requiring higher beam energy to penetrate the pelvic bones [3]. The imaging of this anatomical area also involves the exposure of radiosensitive reproductive organs [2,6] and, for that reason, optimisation is critical since there is a potential risk of developing radiation-induced biological changes [2,3,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations