2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dose-escalated re-irradiation improves outcome in locally recurrent head and neck cancer – Results of a large multicenter analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The selection of patients to undergo reirradiation is challenging and needs to be led by a multidisciplinary team. Patients with more than 2 years since their first course of radiation ( 34 ) and ECOG performance score of 0 ( 50 ) had better outcomes in this sample.…”
Section: Radiotherapy In Recurrent/metastatic Head and Neck Cancermentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The selection of patients to undergo reirradiation is challenging and needs to be led by a multidisciplinary team. Patients with more than 2 years since their first course of radiation ( 34 ) and ECOG performance score of 0 ( 50 ) had better outcomes in this sample.…”
Section: Radiotherapy In Recurrent/metastatic Head and Neck Cancermentioning
confidence: 87%
“…On the other hand, the median survival of 23 months in patients with curative treatment intent, is a confirmation of the poor prognosis of these patients described in the literature [3] . The large differences reported in median survival of re-irradiated patients, from six to 28 months [28] , [29] , [30] , [31] , may be explained by the patient heterogeneity. Postoperative re-irradiation has been associated with improved survival versus primary re-irradiation [3] , [8] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…His study included 253 patients treated at 16 university hospitals. The results showed that patients with good ECOG PS and rRT doses above 50 Gy (EQD2) had median longer OS (17.8 months vs. 11.7 months, p < 0.01) and PFS (9.6 months vs. 6.8 months, p < 0.01) compared to those with poor ECOG PS and rRT below 50 Gy (EQD2) (p < 0.01) [22]. These findings provide important information for clinicians who are considering rRT treatment options for patients with rHNC [9,13,14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%