2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.03.075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dose effects of tricyclic antidepressants in the treatment of acute depression – A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…13,16,77,78 For example, in a meta-analysis of antidepressant drug treatment at various time points between 8 and 24 weeks, effects remained within a range of 0.24 to 0.34. 14 Given the moderate effect size and absent clean-cut criteria of what constitutes a clinically meaningful improvement in quality of life, we argue that the case for a convincing effect is still out. That does not preclude important improvements in individual cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…13,16,77,78 For example, in a meta-analysis of antidepressant drug treatment at various time points between 8 and 24 weeks, effects remained within a range of 0.24 to 0.34. 14 Given the moderate effect size and absent clean-cut criteria of what constitutes a clinically meaningful improvement in quality of life, we argue that the case for a convincing effect is still out. That does not preclude important improvements in individual cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Two authors (TW, SK) independently extracted data from the studies included using a standardized Excel‐form similar to those employed in earlier studies of our group 12 – 16 . Specifically, we collected information on number, gender, and age of participants, diagnosis, interventions, trial duration, psychometric instruments employed, results (point estimates and measures of dispersion), as well as meta‐data regarding authors, journal, publication year, and funding source.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Independently, two authors (S.K., T.W.) extracted data on the studies included employing a pre-specified and standardized Excel form resembling those used in previous studies of our group Antidepressant Treatment and Social Functioning [8, [15][16][17][18][19]. By study, we documented information on number, sex, and age of subjects, diagnosis, interventions, trial duration, psychometric instruments employed, results (point estimates and measures of dispersion), and meta-data regarding authors, journal, and publication year.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Die aktuelle systematische Metaanalyse zur Dosiswirkungsbeziehung von TZA konnte 15 randomisierte Studien mit insgesamt knapp 1000 Patienten einschließen. Es fand sich ein stärkerer antidepressiver Effekt für eine um 100 mg/d höher liegende Dosierung, der aber nicht statistisch signifikant war 15 . Die Nationale VersorgungsLeitlinie Depression 16 empfiehlt daher in ihrer aktuellen Auflage „Bei Patienten, die mit Serumspiegeln im therapeutischen Bereich nicht auf eine Monotherapie mit einem SSRI ansprechen, soll die Dosis des SSRI nicht erhöht werden.“ sowie „Bei Patienten, die mit Serumspiegeln im therapeutischen Bereich nicht auf eine Monotherapie mit MAO-Inhibitoren, SNRI oder TZA ansprechen, sollte die Dosis nicht erhöht werden.“.…”
Section: Dosissteigerung Ist Keine Empfehlenswerte Strategie Bei Unzu...unclassified