2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-32486-5_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dose Distribution Prediction for Optimal Treamtment of Modern External Beam Radiation Therapy for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, we presented a densely connected U-Net, able to predict 3D VMAT dose distributions for prostate cancer patients. In contrast to previous studies, where model training was performed in 2D [1,4,7,11,12], we suggested a 2.5D training approach using image triplets. In addition, we presented a, to the best of our knowledge, novel treatment planning workflow using a commercially available TPS, to transform model predictions into deliverable treatment plans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this study, we presented a densely connected U-Net, able to predict 3D VMAT dose distributions for prostate cancer patients. In contrast to previous studies, where model training was performed in 2D [1,4,7,11,12], we suggested a 2.5D training approach using image triplets. In addition, we presented a, to the best of our knowledge, novel treatment planning workflow using a commercially available TPS, to transform model predictions into deliverable treatment plans.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A possible way to improve and automate the optimization and treatment planning process is to use state-of-the-art, machine learningbased algorithms and models. Several research groups are making progress incorporating these new technologies into the EBRT process, to accelerate and improve the treatment planning workflow [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. The field of radiation therapy is likely to face tremendous changes regarding patient workflow, availability of artificial intelligence (AI)-based decision supportive tools and treatment planning efficiency and consistency [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6 Automatic treatment planning has been investigated intensively, particularly using artificial intelligence to alleviate the clinical burden of medical physicists and improve consistency. [7][8][9] Initially, knowledge-based planning (KBP) emerged for the prediction of dose-volume objectives using different features and algorithms, including organ-to-target distances and support vector regression, 10,11 to expedite the treatment planning. However, the features in KBP, which are compressed from three-dimensional (3D) dosimetric features, yield a loss of spatial information, which cannot ensure the optimal effectiveness of the prediction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Automatic treatment planning has been investigated intensively, particularly using artificial intelligence to alleviate the clinical burden of medical physicists and improve consistency 7–9 . Initially, knowledge‐based planning (KBP) emerged for the prediction of dose‐volume objectives using different features and algorithms, including organ‐to‐target distances and support vector regression, 10,11 to expedite the treatment planning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%