2021
DOI: 10.1097/jcp.0000000000001387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dose-Dependent Inhibition of CYP2D6 by Bupropion in Patients With Depression

Abstract: PurposeThe aim of this study was to investigate the potential dose-dependent CYP2D6 inhibition by bupropion (BUP) in patients with depression.MethodsPatients combining BUP with venlafaxine were included from a therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) database at the Diakonhjemmet Hospital (Oslo, Norway). The O/N-desmethylvenlafaxine metabolic ratio measured in TDM samples was used as a biomarker for CYP2D6 phenotype and was compared between patients treated with BUP 150 mg/d and 300 mg/d or greater. In addition, refe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This coincides well with a previous report of the potent CYP‐inhibitor paroxetine leading to a 60% elevation in the duloxetine area under the concentration‐time curve (AUC) 15 . It is not surprising that having PM phenotype would be of more consequence than use of an inhibitor, as several studies have reported a slightly higher CYP2D6 activity in patients using potent CYP2D6 inhibitors compared with patients who have genotype‐assigned PM phenotype 16,17 . Furthermore, a pharmacokinetic model developed by Stingl et al estimated that duloxetine oral clearance in CYP2D6 PMs was 69% of the average patient 18 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This coincides well with a previous report of the potent CYP‐inhibitor paroxetine leading to a 60% elevation in the duloxetine area under the concentration‐time curve (AUC) 15 . It is not surprising that having PM phenotype would be of more consequence than use of an inhibitor, as several studies have reported a slightly higher CYP2D6 activity in patients using potent CYP2D6 inhibitors compared with patients who have genotype‐assigned PM phenotype 16,17 . Furthermore, a pharmacokinetic model developed by Stingl et al estimated that duloxetine oral clearance in CYP2D6 PMs was 69% of the average patient 18 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…15 It is not surprising that having PM phenotype would be of more consequence than use of an inhibitor, as several studies have reported a slightly higher CYP2D6 activity in patients using potent CYP2D6 inhibitors compared with patients who have genotype-assigned PM phenotype. 16,17 patient. 18 The results from our study are close to this estimation, with a C/D ratio that was almost doubled in PMs compared with NMs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these findings, a DM/bupropion combination medication under the brand name Auvelity was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in August 2022 to treat MDD in adults. Auvelity's recent approval suggests that DM may be a viable adjunctive therapy for individuals receiving a stable dose of bupropion without remission of their depressive symptoms, although the dose of DM would need to be titrated in accordance with the dose-dependent CYP2D6 inhibition activity of bupropion 16 . As with all serotonergic compounds, prescribers and patients should be informed about the theoretical risks of serotonin syndrome associated with adjunctive DM use.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A limitation of our study is that daily doses of the inhibitors/inducers of CYP2C19 were not recorded due to the retrospective nature of this study. However, a recent study showed that the phenoconversion effect might be dose-dependent [44]. Also, the phenoconversion was calculated based on the genetic phenotype, not on haplotypes due to the low number of patients; however, a study of de Jong showed that the phenoconversion might depend upon the specific polymorphism (e. g.,*1/*17 vs.*2/*17) [45].…”
Section: Strengths and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%