2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.04.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dose-controlled exposure of A549 epithelial cells at the air–liquid interface to airborne ultrafine carbonaceous particles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
101
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
9
101
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the cell-specific deposition efficiency is roughly half of the inner deposition efficiency, i.e. 35%, which is much greater than the collection efficiencies reported in the literature [16,17]. Comparing MEC with the previous in-house constructed exposure chamber (MAAPHRI version), the cell-specific collection efficiency of the current version has significantly increased by 120%, since in MAAPHRI version the inner deposition efficiency was 76%, but the ratio of growth area per the total surface of the chamber was only 21% (cell-specific collection efficiency 16%).…”
Section: Average 82%mentioning
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consequently, the cell-specific deposition efficiency is roughly half of the inner deposition efficiency, i.e. 35%, which is much greater than the collection efficiencies reported in the literature [16,17]. Comparing MEC with the previous in-house constructed exposure chamber (MAAPHRI version), the cell-specific collection efficiency of the current version has significantly increased by 120%, since in MAAPHRI version the inner deposition efficiency was 76%, but the ratio of growth area per the total surface of the chamber was only 21% (cell-specific collection efficiency 16%).…”
Section: Average 82%mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…In most of these techniques, the design is relying on diffusion and/or gravitational settling deposition mechanisms of the nanoparticles, as the aerosol flows directly to the cell culture surface by an inlet tube ending above it (basic configuration of commercial CULTEX® exposure system) using a stagnation point flow system [15]. Despite the advantageous operation compared with the liquid cover exposure, in this configuration the deposition efficiency of nanoparticles is typically low over a broad size range of 50 to 500 nm in (mobility) diameter; deposition efficiencies from 0.7% [16] to 2% [17] (for 200nm diameter particles) have been reported in the literature for systems with the aforementioned deposition mechanisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A commercially available perfusion unit (MINUCELL, Bad Abbach, Germany) was adapted to study the biological effects of fine and ultrafine particles on cells [87]. The radially symmetric stagnation point flow arrangement deposits particles uniformly and quantifiable onto a cell layer.…”
Section: Longtime Low-dose Deposition In Environmental Toxicologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ideally, ALI exposure systems must be able to deliver aerosol doses accurately over time, while keeping cell lines alive. Achieving this in practice presents a number of challenges, including determination of actual dose in contact with cells, resultant particle-size distribution, addressing perfusion and viability of cells, and acquisition of sufficient sample due to deposition efficiencies as low as 2% 159 .…”
Section: Lung-air Interface Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include the Cultex ® and Minucell ® systems 40,159 . Depending on requirements, the submersion of cells into the media and airflow parameters can be adjusted (see Figure 5).…”
Section: Lung-air Interface Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%