Proceedings of the 8th Software Security, Protection, and Reverse Engineering Workshop 2018
DOI: 10.1145/3289239.3289243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DoSE

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a consequence, several works focus on the deobfuscation of opaque predicates (e.g. [5,7,8,16,29,32,42]) in order to evaluate the quality of the obfuscated code rendered by this transformation. However, these techniques are often based on dynamic analysis and are therefore limited or not scalable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, several works focus on the deobfuscation of opaque predicates (e.g. [5,7,8,16,29,32,42]) in order to evaluate the quality of the obfuscated code rendered by this transformation. However, these techniques are often based on dynamic analysis and are therefore limited or not scalable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%